SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[_] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[_] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE
COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY
RULE 14A-6(E)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[_] Definitive Additional Materials
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S) 240.14a-12
HALLIBURTON COMPANYHalliburton Company
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
N/A
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[_] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[_] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
[LOGO OF HALIBURTON COMPANY][LOGO]
March 23, 200020, 2001
To Our Stockholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
Halliburton Company. The meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 16, 2000,15, 2001, at 9:00
a.m. in the Parisian Room of the Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street,
Dallas, Texas 75201. The Notice of Annual Meeting, proxy statement and proxy
card from the Board of Directors are enclosed. The materials provide further
information concerning the Annual Meeting.
At the meeting, stockholders are being asked to:
. elect a Board of Directors of tenthirteen Directors to serve for the
coming year;
. ratify the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP as independent accountants
to examine the financial statements and books and records of
Halliburton for 2000;2001; and
. act upon a proposalconsider three stockholder proposals.
Please refer to amend and restate the 1993 Stock and Long-Term
Incentive Plan.proxy statement for detailed information on each of these
proposals.
It is very important that your shares are represented and voted at the
meeting. Accordingly, please sign, date and returnYour shares may be voted by returning the enclosed proxy card, by
telephone or callvia the toll-free number indicated in the enclosed telephone voting
instructions.Internet. If you attend the meeting, you may vote in
person even if you have previously mailed a proxy card or voted by telephone.telephone or
via the Internet. We would appreciate your informing us on the proxy card if
you expect to attend the meeting so that we can provide adequate seating.
The continuing interest of our stockholders in the business of Halliburton is
appreciated and we hope many of you will be able to attend the Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
/s/ DICK CHENEY
Dick CheneyDavid J. Lesar
David J. Lesar
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
[LOGO OF HALIBURTON COMPANY][LOGO]
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be Held May 16, 200015, 2001
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Halliburton Company, a Delaware
corporation, will be held on Tuesday, May 16, 2000,15, 2001, at 9:00 a.m., in the
Parisian Room of the Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas
75201. At the meeting, the stockholders will be asked to consider and act upon
the matters discussed in the attached proxy statement as follows:
1. To elect ten (10)thirteen (13) Directors to serve for the ensuing year and
until their successors shall be elected and shall qualify.
2. To consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of
Arthur Andersen LLP as independent accountants to examine the
financial statements and books and records of Halliburton for the year
2000.2001.
3. To consider and act upon the proposal set forth on pages 29 through 35
of the proxy statement to amend and restate the 1993 Stock and Long-Term
Incentive Plan.three proposals submitted by stockholders.
4. To transact any other business that properly comes before the meeting
or any adjournment or adjournments of the meeting.
These items are fully described in the following pages, which are made a part
of this Notice. The Board of Directors has fixed Monday, March 20, 2000,19, 2001, at the
close of business, as the record date for the determination of stockholders
entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment of the
meeting.
AThe Company requests that you vote your shares as promptly as possible. You
may vote your shares in a number of ways. You may mark your votes, date, sign
and return the proxy statement is attachedcard or voting instruction form. If you have shares
registered in your own name, you may choose to vote those shares via the
Internet at http://www.proxyvoting.com/hal, or you may vote telephonically,
within the U.S. and incorporatedCanada only, by reference.calling 1-800-840-1208 (toll-free). If you
hold Halliburton shares with a broker or bank, you may also be eligible to vote
via the Internet or by telephone if your broker or bank participates in the
proxy voting program provided by ADP Investor Communication Services.
By order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Susan SS. Keith
Susan S. Keith
Vice President and Secretary
March 23, 200020, 2001
----------------
Stockholders are urged to vote their shares as promptly as possible by either
(1)
signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card or (2) calling the
toll-free number indicated infollowing the
enclosed telephone voting instructions.instructions to vote via the Internet or by telephone.
PROXY STATEMENT
GENERAL INFORMATION
The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of the Board of Directors of Halliburton
Company. By executing and returning the enclosed proxy or by following the
enclosed telephone voting instructions, you authorize the persons named in the proxy to
represent you and vote your shares on the matters described in the Notice of
Annual Meeting.
If you attend the meeting, you may vote in person. If you are not present,
your shares can be voted only if you have returned a properly executed proxy or
followed the instructions for voting by telephone voting instructions.or via the Internet. If you
have returned a properly executed proxy or followed the instructions for voting
by telephone voting instructions,or via the Internet, your shares will be voted as you specify. If
no specification is made, the shares will be voted in accordance with the
recommendations of the Board of Directors. You may revoke the authorization
given in your proxy or telephone call at any time before the shares are voted at the meeting.
The record date for determination of the stockholders entitled to vote at the
Annual Meeting is the close of business on March 20, 2000.19, 2001. Halliburton's Common
Stock, par value $2.50, is the only class of capital stock that is outstanding.
As of March 20, 2000,19, 2001, there were 443,724,145429,030,141 shares of Common Stock
outstanding. Each of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is entitled to one
vote on each matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote at the meeting. A
complete list of stockholders entitled to vote will be kept at our offices at
the address specified below for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.
Votes cast by written proxy telephone or in person at the Annual Meeting will be counted by the
persons appointed by us to act as election inspectors for the meeting. Except
as set forth below, the affirmative vote of the majority of shares present in
person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the
subject matter shallwill be the act of the stockholders. Shares for which a holder
has elected to abstain on a matter will count for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum and will be considered a vote against the matter.
In the election of Directors, the candidates for election receiving the
highest number of affirmative votes of the shares entitled to be voted (whether
or not a majority of the shares present), up to the number of Directors to be
elected by those shares, will be elected. Shares present but not voting on the
election of Directors will be disregarded (except for quorum purposes) and will
have no legal effect.
The election inspectors will treat "broker non-vote" shares (i.e., shares held in street name which cannot be
voted by a broker on specific matters in the absence of instructions from the
beneficial owner of the shares)shares, known as broker non-vote shares, as shares that
are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a
quorum. In determining the outcome of any matter for which the broker does not
have discretionary authority to vote, however, those shares will be treated as
not present and not entitled to vote on that matter. Those shares may be
entitled to vote on other matters.
In accordance with our confidential voting policy, no vote of any stockholder whether by written proxy, telephone or in person,
will be disclosed to Halliburton's officers, Directors or employees, except:
. as necessary to meet legal requirements and to assert claims for and
defend claims against Halliburton;
. when disclosure is voluntarily made or requested by the stockholder;
. when stockholders write comments on proxy cards; or
. in the event of a proxy solicitation not approved and recommended by
the Board of Directors.
The proxy solicitor, the election inspectors and the tabulators of all proxies,
ballots and voting tabulations that identify stockholders are independent and
are not employees of Halliburton.
1
This proxy statement, the form of proxy and telephone voting instructions are being
sent to stockholders on or about April 3, 2000.2, 2001. Our Annual Report to
Stockholders, including financial statements, for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 19992000 accompanies this proxy statement. The Annual Report is not to
be considered as a part of the proxy solicitation material or as having been
incorporated by reference.
Our principal executive office is located at 3600 Lincoln Plaza, 500 N. Akard
Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-3391.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Item 1)
Mr. Delano E. Lewis,Richard B. Cheney, who has served as a Director since 1996, retired from
the Board of Directors on December 10, 1999, just prior to his being sworn in
as U.S. Ambassador to South Africa. Mr. William E. Bradford, who has served as
a Director since 1998, and prior to the merger with Dresser Industries, Inc.,
served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, of Dresser,
retired from the Board on January 31, 2000. Mr. Bradford and Mr. Lewis will
not be candidates for election for the ensuing year. Following the retirements
of Messrs. Bradford and Lewis, the number of Directors that constitute the
Board was reduced to twelve, eliminating the vacancies caused by their
retirements. Ms. Anne L. Armstrong, who has served as a Director since 1977,
and Mr. Richard J. Stegemeier, who has served as a Director since 1994, are
both retiring from the Board of Directors immediately priorand the company on
August 16, 2000, in order to run as the Republican Party's Vice Presidential
candidate. Contemporaneously with Mr. Cheney's retirement, Mr. David J. Lesar
was elected to the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders on May 16, 2000. They will not be candidatesBoard to fill the vacancy. Mr. Lesar is being proposed for
the first time for election forto the ensuing year. Due to Ms. Armstrong's and Mr. Stegemeier's
retirements,Board of Directors by the stockholders.
Effective at 9:00 a.m., May 15, 2001, the number of Directors constitutingwhich will
constitute the Board of Directors will be reducedincreased from twelve10 to ten effective at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) on May 16, 2000.
Ten13. Kenneth T. Derr, Aylwin
B. Lewis and Debra L. Reed are proposed for the first time for election as
Directors to fill the vacancies created by the increase.
Thirteen Directors are to be elected to serve for the ensuing year and until
their successors are elected and qualify. AllTen of the ten nominees listed below are
presently Directors of Halliburton. It is intended that the Common Stock
represented by the proxies, in the absence of instructions to the contrary,
will be voted for the election as Directors of the tenthirteen nominees. If any of
the nominees are unwilling or unable to serve, favorable and uninstructed
proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board of
Directors. If a suitable substitute is not available, the Board of Directors
will reduce the number of Directors to be elected. Each nominee has indicated
approval of his or her nomination and his or her willingness to serve if
elected.
Information About Nominees for Director
RICHARD B. (DICK) CHENEY, 59, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company; Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, 1998-2000; Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, 1997-1998; Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, 1996-1997;
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, 1995;
Senior Fellow, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy
Research, 1993-1995; United States Secretary of Defense, 1989-
1993; Member, United States House of Representatives, 1979-1989;
joined Halliburton Company Board in 1995; Director of Union
Pacific Corporation, The Procter & Gamble Company and Electronic
Data Systems Corporation; Member of the Board of Trustees,
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
[PHOTO OF CHENEY]
LORD CLITHEROE, 70,71, Retired Chairman, The Yorkshire Bank, PLC
(retired);PLC;
Deputy Chief Executive, The RTZ Corporation PLC (an
international group of mining and industrial companies), 1987-
1989; Executive Director, The RTZ Corporation PLC, 1968-1987;
joined Halliburton Company Board in 1987; Chairman of the
Health, Safety and Environment Committee and member of the
Compensation, the Management Oversight and the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees.
[PHOTO OF CLITHEROE]
2
[PHOTO]
ROBERT L. CRANDALL, 64,65, Chairman Emeritus, AMR
Corporation/American Airlines, Inc. (engaged primarily in the
air transportation business); Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, AMR Corporation and Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, American Airlines, Inc. 1985-1998; President,
American Airlines, Inc., 1985-1995; joined Halliburton Company
Board in 1986; Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and member of the Audit, the Compensation
and the Management Oversight Committees; Director of MediaOne
Group,Celestica
Inc., American Express Company, Clear Channel Communications,
Inc. and Celestica,Anixter International Inc.
[PHOTO OF CRANDALL][PHOTO]
2
KENNETH T. DERR, 64, Retired Chairman of the Board, Chevron
Corporation (an international oil company); Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, Chevron Corporation, 1989-1999; Director of
AT&T Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Potlatch Corporation.
[PHOTO]
CHARLES J. DIBONA, 68,69, Retired President and Chief Executive
Officer,
(retired), American Petroleum Institute (a major petroleum
industry trade association), 1979-1997; joined Halliburton
Company Board in 1997; member of the Health, Safety and
Environment, the Compensation and the Management Oversight
Committees; Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Logistics
Management Institute.
[PHOTO OF DIBONA][PHOTO]
LAWRENCE S. EAGLEBURGER, 69,70, Senior Foreign Policy Advisor,
Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell (a Washington, D.C. law
firm); United States Secretary of State, Department of State,
1992-1993; Acting Secretary of State, 1992; Deputy Secretary of
State, 1989-1992; joined Halliburton Company Board in 1998;
member of the Audit, the Compensation, the Management Oversight
and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees; Director
of Phillips Petroleum Company, Stimsonite, Universal
Corporation, Corning Corp. and COMSAT.
[PHOTO OF EAGLEBURGER][PHOTO]
W. R. HOWELL, 64,65, Chairman Emeritus, J.C. Penney Company, Inc.
(a major retailer); Chairman of the Board, J.C. Penney Company,
Inc., 1983-1996; Chief Executive Officer, J.C. Penney Company,
Inc., 1983-1995; joined Halliburton Company Board in 1991;
Chairman of the Management Oversight Committee and member of the
Audit and the Compensation Committees; Director of Exxon Mobil
Corporation, Warner-Lambert Company,Pfizer Inc., Bankers Trust Company, Bankers Trust
New York Corporation, The Williams Companies, Inc. and Central and South West Corporation.
[PHOTO OF HOWELL]American
Electric Power Company, Inc.
[PHOTO]
RAY L. HUNT, 56,57, For more than five years, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer, Hunt Oil Company (oil and gas
exploration and development); Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President, Hunt Consolidated, Inc. and
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President,
RRH Corporation; joined Halliburton Company Board in 1998;
Chairman of the Compensation Committee and member of the Audit
and the Management Oversight Committees; Director of Electronic
Data Systems Corporation, PepsiCo, Inc. and Security Capital
Group Incorporated.
[PHOTO OF HUNT]Incorporated; Class C Director of the Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas.
[PHOTO]
DAVID J. LESAR, 47, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company; President of the Company,
1997-2000; Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
1995-1997; joined Halliburton Company Board in 2000; Director of
Lyondell Chemical Company and Mirant Corporation.
[PHOTO]
3
AYLWIN B. LEWIS, 46, Chief Operating Officer, TRICON Global
Restaurants, Inc. (a quick service restaurant company);
Executive Vice President, Operations and New Business
Development, TRICON Global Restaurants, Inc., January-July 2000;
Chief Operating Officer, Pizza Hut, Inc., 1997-1999; Senior Vice
President, Operations, Pizza Hut, Inc., 1996-1997; Senior Vice
President, Marketing and Operations Development, KFC-Pepsico,
Inc., 1995-1996.
[PHOTO]
J. LANDIS MARTIN, 54,55, For more than five years, President and
Chief Executive Officer, NL Industries, Inc. (a manufacturer and
marketer of titanium dioxide pigments) and Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, Titanium Metals Corporation (an integrated
producer of titanium metals); President, Titanium Metals
Corporation, since 2000; Chief Executive Officer, Titanium
Metals Corporation, since 1995; Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, Baroid Corporation (and its predecessor),
acquired by Dresser Industries, Inc. in 1994, 1990-1994; joined
Halliburton Company Board in 1998; member of the Health, Safety
and Environment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance and the
Management Oversight Committees; Director of NL Industries,
Inc., Titanium Metals Corporation, Tremont Corporation,
Apartment Investment and Management Corporation, and Crown Castle
[PHOTO] International Corporation and Special Metals Corporation.
[PHOTO OF MARTIN]
3
JAY A. PRECOURT, 62,63, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer, Hermes Consolidated, Inc. (a gatherer, transporter and
refiner of crude oil and crude oil products); Vice Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, Tejas Gas Corporation, (a natural gas pipeline and marketing
company), 1986-1999;
President, Tejas Gas Corporation, 1996-
1998;1996-1998; joined Halliburton
Company Board in 1998; member of the Compensation, the Health,
Safety and Environment and the Management Oversight Committees;
Chairman of the Board and Director of Founders Funds, Inc. and
Director of the Timken Company.
[PHOTO OF PRECOURT][PHOTO]
DEBRA L. REED, 44, President, San Diego Gas & Electric Company
(a regulated utility company); President-Energy Distribution
Services, Southern California Gas Company, 1998-2000; Senior
Vice President, Southern California Gas Company, 1995-1998.
[PHOTO]
C. J. SILAS, 67,68, Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, (retired), Phillips Petroleum Company (engaged in
exploration and production of crude oil, natural gas and natural
gas liquids on a worldwide basis, the manufacture of plastics
and petrochemicals and other activities), 1985-1994;; Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer Phillips Petroleum Company, 1985-
1994; joined Halliburton Company Board in 1993; Chairman of the
Audit Committee and member of the Compensation and the
Management Oversight Committees; Director of Reader's Digest
Association, Inc.
[PHOTO OF SILAS][PHOTO]
4
Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth information about persons or groups who, based
on information contained in Schedules 13G filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission reflecting beneficial ownership at December 31, 1999,2000, own
or have the right to acquire more than five percent of our Common Stock.
Amount and
Nature of Percent
Name and Address Beneficial of
of Beneficial Owner Ownership Class
------------------- ---------- -------
FMR Corp. .............................................. 55,124,013(1) 12.478%................................................ 41,076,328(1) 9.619%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
- --------
(1) The number of shares reported includes 49,414,44939,081,761 shares beneficially owned
by Fidelity Management & Research Company, 4,329,7241,255,467 shares owned by
Fidelity Management Trust Company and 1,379,840739,100 shares held by Fidelity
International Limited. FMR Corp., through control of Fidelity Management &
Research Company and Fidelity Management Trust Company, has sole
dispositive power over the shares with the exception of those held
beneficially by Fidelity International Limited. FMR Corp. has sole power to
vote or to direct the vote of 2,848,024861,667 shares of Common Stock.
4
The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2000,19, 2001, the amount of our
Common Stock owned beneficially by each Director and nominee for Director, each
of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 2016
and all Directors, nominees for Director and executive officers as a group.
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sole Shared
Voting and Voting or
NmeName of Beneficial Owner oraor Investment Investment Percent
umberNumber of Persons in GroupN PowerGroup Power(1) Power(2) of Class
- --------------------------- ---------- ---------- --------
Anne L. Armstrong.............................. 4,800 *
William E. Bradford(3)......................... 811,842 *
Richard B. Cheney(3)........................... 1,089,000Cheney........................... 200,000(3) *
Lord Clitheroe................................. 3,400Clitheroe.............................. 4,800 *
Lester L. Coleman(3)........................... 187,578Coleman........................... 210,980 *
Robert L. Crandall............................. 3,800Crandall.......................... 5,200 *
Kenneth T. Derr............................. 2,000 *
Charles J. DiBona.............................. 800DiBona........................... 2,200 *
Lawrence S. Eagleburger(3)..................... 10,656Eagleburger..................... 12,557 *
W. R. Howell................................... 2,700Howell................................ 4,100 *
Ray L. Hunt(3)................................. 71,346 69,712(2)Hunt................................. 78,247 69,712(4) *
David J. Lesar(3).............................. 432,042Lesar.............................. 629,200 *
Aylwin B. Lewis............................. 0 *
J. Landis Martin(3)............................ 92,045Martin............................ 51,601 *
Gary V. Morris(3).............................. 157,729Morris.............................. 215,017 *
Jay A. Precourt(3)............................. 10,513Precourt............................. 19,240 *
David A. Reamer............................. 127,242 *
Debra L. Reed............................... 0 250(4) *
C. J. Silas.................................... 2,800 *
Richard J. Stegemeier.......................... 2,400 2,000(2)Silas................................. 4,200 *
Donald C. Vaughn(3)............................ 372,607Vaughn............................ 221,409 *
Shares owned by all current Directors,
nominees for Director and executive
officers as a group (22(24 persons)(3)............................... 3,540,165 71,712........... 2,039,801 69,962 *
- --------
* Less than 1% of shares outstanding.
(1) The Halliburton Stock Fund is an investment fund established under the
Halliburton Company Employee Benefit Master Trust to hold Halliburton
Common Stock for some of Halliburton's profit sharing, retirement and
savings plans (the "Plans"). The Fund held 4,167,912 shares of Common Stock
at March 14, 2000. One executive officer not named in the above table has
beneficial interests in the Fund. Shares held in the Fund are not allocated
to any individual's account. A total of 508 shares which might be deemed to
be beneficially owned as of March 14, 2000 by the unnamed executive officer
is not included in the table above. The Trustee, State Street Bank and
Trust Company, votes shares held in the Halliburton Stock Fund in
accordance with voting instructions from the participants. Under the terms
of the Plans, a participant has the right to determine whether up to 15% of
his account balance in a plan is invested in the Halliburton Stock Fund.
The Trustee, however, determines when sales or purchases are to be made.
(2) Mr. Hunt holds 69,712 shares as the trustee of trusts established for the
benefit of his children. Mr. Stegemeier and his wife hold 2,000 shares as
co-trustees of a family trust and share voting and investment power over
those shares.
(3) Included in the table are shares of Common Stock that may be purchased
pursuant to outstanding stock options (and, in the case of Messrs. Bradford
andMr. Vaughn,
related restricted incentive stock awards under specific Dresser
Industries, Inc. stock compensation plans) within 60 days of the date of
this proxy statement for the following: Mr. Bradford--526,653;Cheney--200,000; Lord
Clitheroe--1,000; Mr. Cheney--860,000;Coleman--159,667; Mr. Coleman--157,667;Crandall--1,000; Mr. Eagleburger--999;DiBona--
1,000; Mr. Hunt--999;Eagleburger--2,500; Mr. Lesar--233,669;Howell--1,000; Mr. Martin--999;Hunt--7,500; Mr.
Morris--98,667;Lesar--362,036; Mr. Precourt--999;Martin--7,500; Mr. Vaughn--320,205Morris--128,667; Mr. Precourt--
7,500; Mr. Reamer--84,500; Mr. Silas--1,000; Mr. Vaughn--
5
114,163 and foursix unnamed executive officers--205,467.officers--148,541. Until the options are
exercised, these individuals will neither have voting nor investment power
over the underlying shares of Common Stock but only have the right to
acquire beneficial ownership of the shares through exercise of their
respective options.
(2) The Halliburton Stock Fund is an investment fund established under the
Halliburton Company Employee Benefit Master Trust to hold Halliburton
Common Stock for some of Halliburton's profit sharing, retirement and
savings plans. The Fund held 4,111,186 shares of Common Stock at March
5, 2001. Mr. Reamer and two executive officers not named in the above
table have beneficial interests in the Fund. Shares held in the Fund are
not allocated to any individual's account. A total of 2,243 shares which
might be deemed to be beneficially owned as of March 5, 2001 by Mr.
Reamer and the unnamed executive officers is not included in the table
above. The Trustee, State Street Bank and Trust Company, votes shares
held in the Halliburton Stock Fund in accordance with voting
instructions from the participants. Under the terms of the plans, a
participant has the right to determine whether up to 15% of his account
balance in a plan is invested in the Halliburton Stock Fund. The
Trustee, however, determines when sales or purchases are to be made.
(3) Mr. Cheney has entered into an irrevocable agreement to donate to
charity the after-tax proceeds from the exercise of all his outstanding
vested and unvested stock options, including the options relating to
200,000 shares referenced in the table. The agreement gives an
administrative agent total discretion to decide when to exercise the
options, without consultation with Mr. Cheney. Mr. Cheney does not own
any shares of Common Stock.
(4) Mr. Hunt holds 69,712 shares as the trustee of trusts established for
the benefit of his children. Ms. Reed has shared voting and investment
power over 250 shares held in her husband's Individual Retirement
Account.
6
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors believes that the primary responsibility of Directors
is to provide effective governance over Halliburton's affairs for the benefit
of its stockholders. That responsibility includes:
. Evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and taking
appropriate action, including removal, when warranted;
. Selecting, evaluating and fixing the compensation of Halliburton's senior
management and establishing policies regarding the compensation of other
members of management;
. Reviewing succession plans and management development programs for
members of senior management;
. Reviewing and approving periodically long-term strategic and business
plans and monitoring corporate performance against the plans;
. Adopting policies of corporate conduct, including compliance with
applicable laws and regulations and maintenance of accounting, financial
and other controls, and reviewing the adequacy of compliance systems and
controls;
. Evaluating periodically the overall effectiveness of the Board; and
. Deciding on matters of corporate governance.
In 1997, the Board adopted Guidelines to assist it in the exercise of its
responsibilities. Effective at the time of the merger of Dresser Industries,
Inc. with Halliburton on September 29, 1998, the Guidelines were revised to
reflect the resulting management and organizational changes, one of which was
to split the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
The office of Chairman of the Board was held by William E. Bradford, Dresser's
former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bradford retired earlier this
year and, following his retirement, Mr. Cheney reassumed the title of Chairman
of the Board. The Guidelines were accordingly modified in February 2000 to
reflect that the Chief Executive Officer would also serve as the Chairman of
the Board. The Guidelines were also revised for the recently adopted New York
Stock Exchange requirements relating to the composition of the Audit Committee
and to make the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee responsible for
review of Director compensation. The revised Guidelines are set forth below.
These Guidelines are in addition to and are not intended to change or interpret
any Federal or state law or regulation, including the Delaware General
Corporation Law, or Halliburton's Certificate of Incorporation or By-laws. The
Guidelines are subject to modification from time to time by the Board of
Directors.Company's Guidelines on Governance (Revised as of February 17, 2000) Operationwere
included in the proxy statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
have not been revised since that date. If you would like a copy of the
Board; Meetings.
1. Chairman ofGuidelines, please contact the BoardVice President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes
that, under normal circumstances, the Chief Executive Officer of Halliburton
should also serve as the Chairman of the Board. The Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer is responsible to the Board for the overall management
and functioning of Halliburton.
The Chairman of the Management Oversight Committee, which is composed of all
of the outside Directors, will function as the lead director when the Committee
meets in executive session outside the presence of the Chief Executive Officer
and other company personnel and will serve as the interface between that
Committee and the Chief Executive Officer in communicating the matters
discussed during the executive sessions.
6
2. Executive Sessions of Outside Directors. The Management Oversight
Committee is composed of all of the outside Directors and meets in executive
session during a portion of each of its five regular meetings per year. In
addition, any member of the Management Oversight Committee may request the
Committee Chairman to call an executive session of the Committee at any time.
Each December, the Management Oversight Committee will meet in executive
session to evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer. In
evaluating the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee takes into consideration
the executive's performance in both qualitative and quantitative areas,
including:
. leadership and vision;
. integrity;
. keeping the Board informed on matters affecting Halliburton and its
operating units;
. performance of the business (including such measurements as total
shareholder return and achievement of financial objectives and goals);
. development and implementation of initiatives to provide long-term
economic benefit to Halliburton;
. accomplishment of strategic objectives; and
. development of management.
The evaluation will be communicated to the Chief Executive Officer by the
Chairman of the Management Oversight Committee and will be used by the
Compensation Committee in the course of its deliberations when considering the
Chief Executive Officer's compensation for the ensuing year.
3. Regular Attendance of Non-Directors at Board Meetings. The Chief
Financial Officer and the General Counsel will be present during Board
meetings, except where there is a specific reason for one or both of them to
be excluded. In addition, the Chairman of the Board may invite one or more
members of management to be in regular attendance at Board meetings and may
include other officers and employees from time to time as appropriate to the
circumstances.
4. Frequency of Board Meetings. The Board has five regularly scheduled
meetings per year. Special meetings are called as necessary. It is the
responsibility of the Directors to attend the meetings.
Long-term strategic and business plans will be reviewed annually at one of
the Board's regularly scheduled meetings.
5. Board Access to Senior Management. Directors have open access to
Halliburton's management, subject to reasonable time constraints. In addition,
members of Halliburton's senior management routinely attend Board and
Committee meetings and they and other managers frequently brief the Board and
the Committees on particular topics. The Board encourages senior management to
bring managers into Board or Committee meetings and other scheduled events who
(a) can provide additional insight into matters being considered or (b)
represent managers with future potential whom senior management believe should
be given exposure to the members of the Board.
6. Selection of Agenda Items for Board Meetings. The Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer establishes the agenda for each Board meeting,
although other Board members are free to suggest items for inclusion on the
agenda. Each Director is free to raise at any Board meeting subjects that are
not on the agenda for that meeting.
7. Board/Committee Forward Agenda. A forward agenda of matters requiring
recurring and focused attention by the Board and each Committee will be
prepared and distributed prior to the beginning of each
7
calendar year in order to ensure that all required actions are taken in a
timely manner and are given adequate consideration.
8. Information Flow; Pre-meeting Materials. In advance of each Board or
Committee meeting, a proposed agenda will be distributed to each member. In
addition, to the extent feasible or appropriate, information and data important
to the members' understanding of the matters to be considered, including
background summaries of presentations to be madeSecretary at the meeting, will be
distributed in advance of the meeting. Directors also routinely receive monthly
financial statements, earnings reports, press releases, analyst reports and
other information designed to keep them informed of the material aspects of
Halliburton's business, performance and prospects.
Board Structure.
1. Majority of the Members of the Board Must Be Independent Directors. The
Board believes that as a matter of policy a majority of the members of the
Board should be independent Directors. A Director will be considered
independent if he or she:
. has not been employed by Halliburton or an affiliate in an executive
capacity;
. is not, and is not an employee of a company or firm that is, a
significant* advisor or consultant to Halliburton or its affiliates;
. is not an employee or beneficial owner of more than 10% of a
significant* customer or supplier of Halliburton or its affiliates;
. does not have a significant* personal services contract(s) with
Halliburton or its affiliates;
. is not affiliated as an employee with a tax-exempt entity that receives
significant contributions from Halliburton or its affiliates;
. is not a spouse, parent, sibling or child of an officer or former
officer of Halliburton or one of its affiliates; and
. is not part of an interlocking directorate in which the Chief Executive
Officer or another executive officer of Halliburton serves on the board
of another corporation that employs the Director.
(* "Significant" means a business relationship that would require disclosure
under SEC rules.)
The definition of independence and compliance with this policy will be
reviewed periodically by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Board believes that employee Directors should number not more than two.
While this number is not an absolute limitation, other than the Chief Executive
Officer, who should at all times be a member of the Board, employee Directors
should be limited only to those officers whose positions or potential make it
appropriate for them to sit on the Board.
2. Size of the Board. The Board currently has 12 members. The By-laws
prescribe that the number of Directors will not be less than eight nor more
than 20.
3. Service of Former Chief Executive Officers and Other Former Employees on
the Board. Employee Directors shall retire from the Board at the time of their
retirement as an employee unless continued service as a Director is requested
and approved by the Board.
4. Annual Election of All Directors. As provided in Halliburton's By-laws,
all Directors are elected annually.
8
5. Board Membership Criteria. Candidates nominated for election or reelection
to the Board of Directors should possess the following qualifications:
.Personal characteristics:
.highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values;
. an inquiring and independent mind;
. practical wisdom and mature judgment.
. Broad training and experience at the policy-making level in business,
government, education or technology.
. Expertise that is useful to the company and complementary to the
background and experience of other Board members, so that an optimum
balance of members on the Board can be achieved and maintained.
. Willingness to devote the required amount of time to carrying out the
duties and responsibilities of Board membership.
. Commitment to serve on the Board over a period of several years to
develop knowledge about Halliburton's principal operations.
. Willingness to represent the best interests of all stockholders and
objectively appraise management performance.
. Involvement only in activities or interests that do not create a
conflict with the Director's responsibilities to Halliburton and its
stockholders.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for
assessing the appropriate mix of skills and characteristics required of Board
members in the context of the perceived needs of the Board at a given point in
time and shall periodically review and update the criteria as deemed necessary.
Diversity in personal background, race, gender, age and nationality for the
Board as a whole may be taken into account in considering individual
candidates.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the
qualifications of each Director candidate against this criteria in making its
recommendation to the Board concerning his or her nomination for election or
reelection as a Director.
6. Selection of Directors. The Board is responsible for nominating members to
the Board and for filling vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual
meetings of stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
with direct input from the Chief Executive Officer and other Board members, is
responsible for identifying and screening candidates for Board membership.
7. Director Retirement. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in
consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, will review each Director's
continuation on the Board annually in making its recommendation to the Board
concerning his or her nomination for election or reelection as a Director.
It is the policy of the Board that each non-employee Director shall retire
from the Board immediately prior to the annual meeting of stockholders
following his or her seventy-second birthday. Employee Directors shall retire
at the time of their retirement from employment with Halliburton unless
continued service as a Director is approved by the Board.
8. Director Compensation Review. It is appropriate for senior management of
Halliburton to report periodically to the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee on the status of Halliburton's Director compensation practices in
relation to other companies of comparable size and Halliburton's competitors.
Changes in Director compensation, if any, should come upon the recommendation
of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, but with full discussion
and concurrence by the Board.
9
9. Conflicts of Interest. If an actual or potential conflict of interest
develops because of a change in the business operations of Halliburton or a
subsidiary, or in a Director's circumstances (for example, significant and
ongoing competition between Halliburton and a business with which the Director
is affiliated), the Director should report the matter immediately to the
Chairman of the Board for evaluation. A significant conflict must be resolved
or the Director should resign.
If a Director has a personal interest in a matter before the Board, the
Director shall disclose the interest to the full Board and excuse himself or
herself from participation in the discussion and shall not vote on the matter.
Committees of the Board.
1. Number and Types of Committees. A substantial portion of the analysis and
work of the Board is done by standing Board Committees. A Director is expected
to participate actively in the meetings of each Committee to which he or she is
appointed.
The Board has established the following standing Committees: Management
Oversight; Audit; Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance; and
Health, Safety and Environment. Each Committee's charter is to be reviewed
periodically by the Committee and the Board.
2. Composition of Committees. It is the policy of the Board that only non-
employee Directors serve on Board Committees.
A Director who is part of an interlocking directorate (i.e., one in which the
Chief Executive Officer or another Halliburton executive officer serves on the
board of another corporation that employs the Director) may not serve on the
Compensation Committee. The composition of the Compensation Committee will be
reviewed annually to ensure that each of its members meet the criteriaaddress set
forth in applicable SEC and IRS rules and regulations.
In addition, the compositionon page 2 of the Audit Committee will be reviewed annually
to ensure that each of its members meets the criteria set forth in applicable
NYSE and SEC rules and regulations.
3. Assignment and Rotation of Committee Members. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, with direct input from the Chief Executive Officer,
recommends to the Board the membership of the various Committees and their
Chairmen and the Board approves the Committee assignments. In making its
recommendations to the Board, the Committee takes into consideration the need
for continuity; subject matter expertise; applicable SEC, IRS or NYSE
requirements; tenure; and the desires of individual Board members.
4. Frequency and Length of Committee Meetings. Each Committee shall meet as
frequently and for such length of time as may be required to carry out its
assigned duties and responsibilities. The schedule for regular meetings of the
Board and Committees for each year is submitted and approved by the Board in
advance. In addition, the Chairman of a Committee may call a special meeting at
any time if deemed advisable.
5. Committee Agendas; Reports to the Board. Appropriate members of management
and staff will prepare draft agenda and related background information for each
Committee meeting which, to the extent desired by the relevant Committee
Chairman, will be reviewed and approved by the Committee Chairman in advance of
distribution to the other members of the Committee. A forward agenda of
recurring topics to be discussed during the year will be prepared for each
Committee and furnished to all Directors. Each Committee member is free to
suggest items for inclusion on the agenda and to raise at any Committee meeting
subjects that are not on the agenda for that meeting.
Reports on each Committee meeting (other than Management Oversight Committee
meetings) are made to the full Board. All Directors are furnished copies of
each Committee's minutes.
10
Other Board Practices.
1. Director Orientation. An orientation program has been developed for new
Directors which includes comprehensive information about Halliburton's business
and operations; general information about the Board and its Committees,
including a summary of Director compensation and benefits; and a review of
Director duties and responsibilities.
2. Board Interaction with Institutional Investors and Other Stakeholders. The
Board believes that it is senior management's responsibility to speak for
Halliburton. Individual Board members may, from time to time, meet or otherwise
communicate with outside constituencies that are involved with Halliburton. In
those instances, however, it is expected that Directors will do so only with
the knowledge of senior management and, absent unusual circumstances, only at
the request of senior management.
3. Periodic Review of These Guidelines. The operation of the Board of
Directors is a dynamic and evolving process. Accordingly, these Guidelines will
be reviewed periodically by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
and any recommended revisions will be submitted to the full Board for
consideration.
11
this proxy statement.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND
STANDING COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors has standing Audit; Compensation; Nominating and
Corporate Governance; Health, Safety and Environment; and Management Oversight
Committees. Each of the standing Committees is comprised entirely of outside
Directors, none of whom is an employee or former employee of Halliburton.
During the last fiscal year, the Board of Directors met on 79 occasions, the
Audit Committee met on 36 occasions, the Compensation Committee met on 45
occasions, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met on 3
occasions, the Health, Safety and Environment Committee met on 2 occasions, and
the Management Oversight Committee met on 5 occasions. Except for Lawrence S.Messrs.
Eagleburger and Hunt, no other incumbent member of the Board attended fewer
than 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the Board and the Committees
on which he or she served during the last fiscal year.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee's role is one of oversight, while Halliburton's
management is responsible for preparing financial statements. The independent
auditors are responsible for auditing those financial statements. The Audit
Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to Halliburton's
financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent
auditor's work. The following functions are the key responsibilities of the
Audit Committee in carrying out its oversight:
. recommending the appointment of independent auditors to the Board of
Directors;
. reviewing the scope of the independent auditors' examination and the
scope of activities of the internal audit department;
. reviewing Halliburton's financial policies and accounting systems and
controls;
. reviewing audited financial statements and interim financial
statements;
. starting with the 2001 proxy statement, preparing a report for inclusion in Halliburton's proxy statement
regarding the Audit Committee's review of audited financial statements
for the last fiscal year which includes a statement on whether it
recommended that the Board include those financial statements in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K;
. approving and ratifying the duties and compensation of the independent
auditors, both for audit and non-audit services; and
. reviewing and assessing the adequacy of the Audit Committee's Charter
annually and recommending revisions to the Board.
The Committee also reviews Halliburton's compliance with its Code of Business
Conduct. The Committee meets separately with the independent auditors and with
members of the internal audit staff, outside the presence of company management
or other employees, to discuss matters of concern, to receive recommendations
or suggestions for change and to exchange relevant views and information. The
Audit Committee and the Board of Directors are ultimately responsible for the
selection, evaluation and replacement of the independent auditors.
Halliburton's Audit Committee Charter is attached as Appendix A.
7
Compensation Committee
Duties of the Compensation Committee include:
. developing and approving an overall executive compensation philosophy,
strategy and framework consistent with corporate objectives and
stockholder interests;
. acting as a salaryreviewing and approving all actions relating to compensation, promotion
committeeand employment-related arrangements for specified officers of
Halliburton, and its subsidiaries and affiliates;
12
. establishing annual performance criteria and reward schedules under
Halliburton's Annual Performance Pay Planannual incentive pay plans and certifying the performance
level achieved and reward payments at the end of each plan year;
. approving any other incentive or bonus plans applicable to specified
officers of Halliburton'sHalliburton, its subsidiaries and affiliates;
. administering awards under Halliburton's 1993 Stock and Long-Term
Incentive Plan and Senior Executives' Deferred Compensation Plan;
. selecting an appropriate comparator group against which Halliburton's
total executive compensation program is measured;
. reviewing and approving agreements or arrangements relatingrecommending to the terms of
employment, continued employment or termination of employment for
specified officers of HalliburtonBoard, as appropriate,
major changes to, and its subsidiaries and affiliates;
and
. acting as a committee for administration oftaking administrative actions associated with,
any other forms of non-salary compensation.compensation under its purview;
. reviewing and approving the stock allocation budget among all employee
groups within Halliburton; and
. monitoring and reviewing periodically overall compensation program
design and practice to ensure continued competitiveness,
appropriateness and alignment with established philosophies, strategies
and guidelines.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:Committee has responsibility for:
. reviewing and periodically reviews and updatesupdating the criteria for Board membership
and evaluatesevaluating the qualifications of each Director candidate against
the criteria;
. assessesassessing the appropriate mix of skills and characteristics required of
Board members;
. identifiesidentifying and screensscreening candidates for Board membership;
. establishesestablishing procedures for stockholders to recommend individuals for
consideration by the Committee as possible candidates for election to
the Board;
. reviewsreviewing annually each Director's continuation on the Board and
recommendsrecommending to the Board a slate of Director nominees for election at
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
. recommendsrecommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board;
. reviewsreviewing periodically the status of each Director to assure compliance
with the Board's policy that at least a majority of Directors meet the
Board's definition of "independent Director";independent Director;
. recommendsrecommending members to serve on the standing Committees of the Board
and the Chairmen of the Committees;
. reviewsreviewing periodically the corporate governance guidelines adopted by
the Board of Directors and recommendsrecommending revisions to the guidelines as
appropriate; and
. reviewsreviewing periodically Halliburton's Director compensation practices
and recommendsrecommending changes, if any, to the Board.
8
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider qualified
nominees recommended by stockholders who may submit recommendations to the
Committee in care of the Vice President and Secretary at the address set forth
on page 2 of this proxy statement. Stockholder nominations must be submitted
prior to year-end and must be accompanied by a description of the
qualifications of the proposed candidate and a written statement from the
proposed candidate that he or she is willing to be nominated and desirous of
serving, if elected.
Nominations by stockholders may also be made at an Annual Meeting of
Stockholders in the manner provided in our By-laws. The By-laws provide that a
stockholder entitled to vote for the election of Directors may make nominations
of persons for election to the Board at a meeting of stockholders by complying
with required notice procedures. Nominations shall be made pursuant to written
notice to the Secretary, which must be received at our principal executive
offices not less than ninety (90) days prior to the anniversary date of the
immediately preceding Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The notice shall set
forth:
. as to each person the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or
re-election as a Director:
. the name, age, business address and residence address of the
person,
. the principal occupation or employment of the person,
13
. the class and number of shares of Halliburton capital stock that
are beneficially owned by the person, and
. all other information relating to the person that is required to be
disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors
pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
. as to the stockholder giving the notice:
. the name and record address of the stockholder, and
. the class and number of shares of Halliburton capital stock that
are beneficially owned by the stockholder.
The proposed nominee may be required to furnish other information as
Halliburton may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of the proposed
nominee to serve as a Director. At any meeting of stockholders, the presiding
officer may disregard the purported nomination of any person not made in
compliance with these procedures.
Health, Safety and Environment Committee
The Health, Safety and Environment Committee has responsibility for:
. reviewing and assessing Halliburton's health, safety and environmental
policies and practices and proposing modifications or additions as
needed;
. overseeing the communication and implementation of these policies
throughout Halliburton;
. reviewing annually the health, safety and environmental performance of
Halliburton's operating units and their compliance with applicable
policies and legal requirements; and
. identifying, analyzing and advising the Board on health, safety and
environmental trends and related emerging issues.
9
Management Oversight Committee
The Management Oversight Committee has responsibility for:
. evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer;
. reviewing succession plans for senior management of Halliburton and its
major operating units;
. evaluating management development programs and activities; and
. reviewing other internal matters of broad corporate significance.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The following persons served as members of the Compensation Committee during
1999: Robert L. Crandall (through May 17, 1999),2000: Charles J. DiBona, (as of May
18, 1999), W. R. Howell, Ray L. Hunt, Delano E. Lewis (through December 10,
1999), Jay A. Precourt, (as of May 18, 1999) and C. J.
Silas.Silas served throughout 2000. Lord Clitheroe, Robert L. Crandall, and Lawrence
S. Eagleburger served on the Committee from February 17, 2000 through December
31, 2000. Anne L. Armstrong and Richard J. Stegemeier served on the Committee
from February 17, 2000 through their retirement date of May 16, 2000. None of
these Directors is an officer or former officer of Halliburton or its
subsidiaries or had a relationship with Halliburton or its subsidiaries
requiring director interlock or insider participation disclosure.
14
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Halliburton's primary mission is to enhance long-term shareholder value by
providing a broad spectrum of high quality services and related products within
the energy services and engineering and construction and equipment manufacturing business segments in which
Halliburton operates. The Compensation Committee of
Directors believesWe believe that Halliburton's total compensation package
for executives should, betherefore, emphasize compensation plans which are linked principally
to increased shareholder value and to measures which drive shareholder value.
The Compensation Committee hasUnder our charter, we are generally responsible for overseeing Halliburton's
overall compensation philosophy and objectives and have specific responsibility
for overseeingreviewing, approving and monitoring the compensation program for the members of the Executive Committee of Halliburton (composed at
the end of 1999 of the four most senior
executive officers) and other senior
officersexecutives of Halliburton and its business units. Our principal function is to
ensure that Halliburton's compensation program is effective in attracting,
retaining and motivating key employees, that it reinforces business strategies
and objectives for enhanced shareholder value and that it is administered in a
fair and equitable manner consistent with established policies and guidelines.
During 2000, we conducted a thorough analysis and study of our charter and
executive compensation philosophy, strategy, framework and processes. With the
help of our outside compensation consultant and Halliburton management, each
component of Halliburton's executive compensation program was extensively
reviewed and adjustments were made where we deemed appropriate.
Overall Executive Compensation Philosophy
The overriding objective of theHalliburton's total compensation package for
senior executives is to emphasize the enhancement of shareholder value. Beyond
this, the Compensation Committee'sour priorities are to establish and maintain competitive executive
compensation programs that enable Halliburton to attract, retain, and motivate
the high caliber executives required for the success of the business.
Halliburton's compensation program is designed and regularly reviewed to ensure
that the program's components:
. support Halliburton's strategies,
. focus executive efforts,
. help achieve business success, and
10
. generate wealth for our shareholders.
In determining what it deemswe deem to be appropriate types and amounts of compensation
for executive officers, the Compensation Committee consultswe consult with outside compensation consultants and
reviewsreview compensation data obtained from independent sources.
In the design and administration of executive compensation programs, the
Compensation Committee refers to,we
reference, but doesdo not necessarily target, current market levels of compensation
at the 50th percentile.percentile for good performance and the 75th percentile for
outstanding performance. In doing so, the
Compensation Committee considerswe consider the competitive market data
for twoa comparator groups:group which reflects the markets in which Halliburton competes
for business and people. The comparator group is composed of:
. specific peer companies within the energy services and engineering and
construction and equipment manufacturing industries; and
. selected companies from general industry having similar revenue size,
number of employees and market capitalization and which, in the Compensation Committee'sour
opinion, provide the most
comparable references for Halliburton's senior executive positions.references.
Regression analysis is used in assessing all market compensation data to
mitigate the impact ofprovide appropriate comparisons based on company size, on compensation levels.
The Compensation Committee considers total compensation, as well as each
component of the compensation package, in determining actual compensation
levels. The total compensation package is expected in most instances to result
in payments at market levels, given acceptable total company and/or business
unitcomplexity and
performance, and above market levels, given outstanding performance.individual role and job content. A consistent present value
methodology is used in assessing stock-based and other long-term incentive
awards.
The Compensation Committee believes itsfocus and mix of executive compensation elements and opportunities are
tailored by individual position to reflect an appropriate balance among fixed
and variable pay, short and long-term focus and individual,
business/organization unit or corporate accountability.
We believe that Halliburton's objectives can be optimized by providing
executives with a compensation package that consists ofof:
. a cash base salary,
. a rewards-oriented compensation program aligned with shareholder value
creation,
. stock-based awards, and
. supplemental retirement benefits.
Compensation Arrangement For Chief Executive Officer InTransition
Richard B. Cheney served as Halliburton's Chief Executive Officer from
October 1995 Halliburton entered into an agreementuntil his resignation and retirement in August 2000 to run as the
Republican Party's Vice Presidential candidate. Effective with Mr. Cheney coveringCheney's
resignation, the termsBoard elected Mr. Lesar as Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer. In September 2000, we reviewed and adjusted Mr.
Lesar's compensation package in view of his employment. Mr.promotion to Chief Executive
Officer.
Messrs. Cheney's and Lesar's employment agreement, which was approved
by the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee, provides for a total
compensation package that reflects Halliburton's objectives of aligning
significant compensation opportunity with the interests of stockholders and
building executive stock ownership. Mr. Cheney's employment agreementagreements with Halliburton isare
summarized beginning on page 2420 of this proxy statement.
15
Base Salary
Ordinarily,We generally review base salaries for theHalliburton's executive officers,
including Mr. Cheney,the Chief Executive Officer, each December. Executive salaries are
reviewed each December by the Compensation Committee. However, as a result
of the completion of the merger with Dresser Industries, Inc. in late September
1998, executive officers' salaries were adjusted effective October 1, 1998referenced to
reflect the increased scope and responsibilities attendant with the management
of a much larger organization. The salary adjustments were based on competitive market data for similarly sized, high-performing companies in general industry.comparable positions within the
comparator group. In addition to considering market comparisons in making
salary decisions, the
Compensation Committee exercisedwe exercise discretion and judgment based on the following
factors:
. the executive's level of responsibility in the new organization;responsibility;
. experience in his/her role and equity issues relating to pay for other
Halliburton executives;
11
. performance; and
. external factors involving competitive positioning, projected overall corporate
performance, and general economic conditions.
No specific formula is applied to determine the weight of each factor.
ForBased on the above factors, at our meeting in December 1999, we:
. did not adjust Mr. Cheney's base salary for 2000, and
. increased Mr. Lesar's base salary, who was at that time Halliburton's
President and Chief Operating Officer, to $900,000.
In addition, in light of Mr. Lesar's promotion to Chief Executive Officer in
August, we increased his annual salary rate to $1,100,000 at our September
meeting. The Summary Compensation Table reflects the total base salaries forsalary paid to
Mr. Cheney andLesar in 2000 as a result of the other executive officers
were not increased beyond the October 1998 adjustment.
Annualtwo adjustments.
Executive Performance Pay Plan
As a means of strengthening the link between total cash compensation and
Halliburton's performance, effectiveEffective January 1, 1995, the Compensation
Committee adopted2000, we established an intermediate term, reward-orientedreward-
oriented program for corporate and business unit executives (the "Annual"Executive
Performance Pay Plan") based onto provide a means to link total compensation to
Halliburton's performance, as measured by cash value added, or CVA. CVA
measures the difference between after tax cash income and a capital charge,
based upon Halliburton's weighted average cost of capital, to determine the
amount of value, in terms of cash flow, added to Halliburton's business. The Compensation
Committee believesWe
believe that, because CVA has been demonstrated to provide a close correlation
to total shareholder return; therefore,return, incentive awards are closely linked to the
improvement of shareholder value. In addition, the Executive Performance Plan
provides that incentive compensation earned will be paid in the form of
restricted stock, in order to:
. further relate compensation earned under the plan to shareholder value
creation,
. build executive stock ownership, and
. provide incentives for executives to focus on a time frame longer than
one year.
At the beginning of each plan year, the Compensation Committee establisheswe establish a reward schedule that
aligns given levels of CVA performance beyond a threshold level with reward
opportunities. The level of achievement of annual CVA performance determines
the dollar amount of incentive compensation payable to a participant. In order
to maximizecompensate for the link betweenfact that the compensation earnedpay out period is longer relative to that
under the Annualpredecessor annual plan, the Executive Performance Pay Plan and shareholder value creation andprovides that
a 25% premium is added to focus executives' attention onthe dollar amount of incentive earned to determine
the number of restricted shares issuable to a time frame longer than one year, only one-half
of the bonus earned in the current year is paid in cash. The remaining one-half
of the bonus is converted into Halliburton Common Stock equivalents and paid in
cash in annual installments in each of the next two years, each installment
based on the then value of one-half the stock equivalents.participant.
Officers of Halliburton and its business units and specific senior managers
were eligible to participate
in the AnnualExecutive Performance Pay Plan during 1999.2000. In 1999,2000, consolidated CVA
performance did not meetexceeded the targetmaximum level established by
the Compensation Committee and, accordingly,that we established. Accordingly, Mr.
CheneyLesar and the other executives named in the Summary Compensation Table (other
than Mr. Cheney) earned norestricted stock based on their maximum incentive
award
underopportunity. In accordance with the provisions of the AnnualExecutive Performance
Pay Plan. However, in accordance
with the terms of Messrs. Bradford's and Vaughn's employment agreements, they
are entitled to receivePlan, Mr. Cheney received a lump sum cash payment equal to the greaterdollar amount of
the amountincentive earned, underprorated through his retirement date. Mr. Cheney did not
receive the Annual Performance Pay Plan or the average of the bonus25% premium. The incentive amounts earned under Dresser's annual incentive plan forby Messrs. Cheney, Lesar
and the 1997 and 1998 fiscal years
("Average Dresser Bonus"). Since no bonus was earned under the Annual
Performance Pay Plan for 1999, Messrs. Bradford and Vaughn received a 1999
payment equal to their respective Average Dresser Bonuses. The amount of these
bonusesother named executives are shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
Stock-Based Compensation
The 1993 Plan provides for a variety of cash and stock-based awards,
including stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock, among
others. The Compensation CommitteeUnder the 1993 Plan, we may, in itsour discretion,
16
select from these types
of awards to establish individual long-term incentive awards or to use as it deems appropriate in specific recruiting and hiring
situations.awards.
12
Stock options were an importantthe principal long-term incentive granted to executive
officers in 1999.2000. Stock options granted in 19992000 are exercisable at the fair
market value of Halliburton Common Stockcommon stock on the date of grant and become
exercisable during employment over a three-year period (one-third per year). Options,We
believe that options, which have value only if the stock price appreciates
following the date of grant, provide an excellent means for linking executives'
interests directly to those of stockholders.
In December 1999, the Compensation Committee reviewed comparative data on
long-term incentive compensation. This information showed that there was a
significant competitive shortfall between long-term incentives for Halliburton
executives and those for comparable positions in both the general industry
comparator group and peer companies. In light of the disparity, the
Compensation Committee increased the number of option shares awarded to
individual executives, including Mr. Cheney, to bring the awards more in line
with competitive market conditions. In addition to its consideration of
competitive factors, the Compensation Committee'sOur determination of the number of option shares granted to executive
officers, wasincluding the grant made to Mr. Lesar in September 2000 in connection
with his promotion, is based on amarket references to long-term incentive
compensation for comparable positions within the comparator group and on our
subjective assessment of organizational roles and internal job relationships.
An option for 300,000 shares was granted to Mr. Lesar in September 2000. Mr.
Cheney was not granted a stock option in December 1999.
In furtherance of the Compensation Committee's philosophy2000.
To further our efforts to tie shareholder value enhancement to compensation
opportunities, it is a stated objective of
the Compensation Committee to broadenwe have broadened the base of employee stock ownership
throughout the company. Accordingly, during 1999, 5,162During 2000, 812 stock option grants for a total of
5,571,6841,733,907 shares were made. The Compensation Committee'sOur intention is to continue this process with
additional grants in the future in order to driveexpand stock option grants deeperfarther into the
organization. The Compensation CommitteeIn order to implement this goal, in 2000 Halliburton's
stockholders approved an amendment of the 1993 Plan increasing the number of
shares authorized for issuance under the 1993 Plan by an additional 22,000,000
shares and broadening the base of employees eligible to participate.
During 2000, we continued to make selective use of restricted stock grants
for retention and promotion recognition purposes.
Proposed 1993 Plan Amendment. On February 17, 2000, the Board of Directors,
upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted an amendment and
restatement of the 1993 Plan. The amendment and restatement will become
effective if approved by stockholders at the 2000 Annual Meeting. The proposed
changes to the 1993 Plan are discussed on pages 29 - 35 of this proxy statement
and the full text of the 1993 Plan as proposed to be amended is attached as
Appendix B. The Compensation Committee believes that the 1993 Plan changes are
necessary in order to continue to attract, retain and motivate eligible
individuals through performance-related incentives.
Senior Executives' Deferred Compensation Plan
Under the terms of the Senior Executives' Deferred Compensation Plan, (the
"SEDC Plan"), which
is used for the purpose of providing supplemental retirement benefits to senior
executives:
. mandatory additions to a participant's account are made to offset
contributions to which each would have been entitled under
Halliburton's qualified defined contribution plans if not for the
limitation on contributions imposed under the Internal Revenue Code
(commonly known as ERISA Offset Benefits);
. additions up to the amount of any remuneration which would otherwise
exceed the deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code may be allocated to a participant's account in lieu of the payment
of the remuneration; and
. discretionary additions, in amounts as the Compensation Committeewe may determine, are made to
provide additional supplemental retirement benefits ("Supplemental Retirement Benefit").benefits.
Interest on active and retired participants' Supplemental Retirement Benefitsupplemental retirement benefit
accounts is accrued at the rate of five and ten percent per annum,
respectively, while interest on the other two account balances accrues at the
rate of ten percent per annum. No amounts may be received by a participant
under the SEDC Planplan prior to termination of the participant's employment.
17
In making Supplemental Retirement Benefitsupplemental retirement benefit contributions under the SEDC Plan,plan,
amounts are determined considering guidelines that include references toto:
. retirement benefits provided from other company programs,
. compensation,
. length of service, with Halliburton and
as an officer, and. years of service to normal retirement.
13
There is no specific weighting of these factors. The Compensation
CommitteeWe authorized a 1999 Supplemental Retirement Benefitsupplemental
retirement benefit addition for Mr. Lesar of $379,000 in 2000. Mr. Cheney of $500,000, the minimum amount specifieddid
not receive a supplemental retirement benefit accrual in his employment agreement.2000.
Policy Regarding Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations
generally disallow a federal income tax deduction by a public company for
compensation paid to the chief executive officer or any of the four other most
highly compensated officers to the extent the compensation exceeds $1 million
in any year. Specific performance-based compensation and compensation which is
deferred is excluded from this calculation.
Halliburton's policy is to utilize available tax deductions whenever
appropriate. The Compensation Committee, whenWhen determining executive compensation programs, considerswe consider all
relevant factors, including the tax deductions that may result from the
compensation. Accordingly, Halliburton has attempted to preserve the federal
tax deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million a year to the extent
doing so is consistent with the intended objectives of the Compensation Committee'sour executive
compensation philosophy.
The 1993 Plan was amended by the stockholders in 1996 and 2000 to qualify
stock options, and stock appreciation rights grantedand performance share awards under the
plan as performance-
basedperformance-based compensation under IRS rules.
In February 2000, the Board adopted new
terms for performance share awards to likewise qualify those awards as
performance-based compensation. These new terms are part of the proposed 1993
Plan amendment being submitted for stockholder approval at this year's Annual
Meeting and are described on page 33 of this proxy statement.
The Compensation Committee believesWe believe that the best interests of Halliburton and its stockholders are
served by the Committee's current executive compensation programs.programs currently in place. These
programs encourage and promote Halliburton's principal compensation objective,
enhancement of shareholder value, and permit the Compensation Committee to exercise of our discretion in
the design and implementation of compensation packages. Accordingly,
Halliburton may from time to time pay compensation to its executive officers
that may not be fully deductible. Because of the mandatory deferral provisions relating to paymentdeferred vesting of incentive compensationrestricted
stock earned under the AnnualExecutive Performance Pay Plan and the elective deferral by
some executive officers of portions of their salary, and
incentive compensation, the loss of deductibility
for 19992000 is not expected to be significant. The Compensation CommitteeWe will continue to review
Halliburton's executive compensation plans periodically to determine what
changes, if any, should be made as the result of the limitation on
deductibility.
Respectfully submitted,
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF
DIRECTORS
Lord Clitheroe*
Robert L. Crandall*
Charles J. DiBona*DiBona
Lawrence S. Eagleburger*
W. R. Howell
Ray L. Hunt
Delano E. Lewis*
Jay A. Precourt*Precourt
C. J. Silas
- --------
* During 1999, Messrs. Clitheroe, Crandall and LewisEagleburger served on the Compensation
Committee from January 1, 1999 through MayFebruary 17, 1999 and December 10, 1999,
respectively. Messrs. DiBona and Precourt served on the Compensation
Committee from May 18, 19992000 through December 31, 1999.
182000.
14
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our
Common Stock for the five-year period ended December 31, 1999,2000, with the
Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index and the Standard & Poor's Energy Composite
Index over the same period. This comparison assumes the investment of $100 on
December 31, 19941995 and the reinvestment of all dividends. On January 23, 1996,
Halliburton distributed to stockholders all of the outstanding common stock of
Highlands Insurance Group, Inc. as a special dividend. The graph accounts for
this distribution as though it were paid in cash and reinvested in our Common
Stock. The stockholder return set forth on the chart below is not necessarily
indicative of future performance.
[GRAPH]
Total Stockholders' Return--FiveReturn -- Five Years
Assumes Investment of $100 on December 31, 199431,1995 and Reinvestment of Dividends
[GRAPH]
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
12/31/94 12/31/95 12/31/96 12/31/97 12/31/98 12/31/99
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
- -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
Halliburton 100 156.72 198.23 345.50 200.08 275.49
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -Company S&P 500 100 137.58 169.16 225.60 290.08 351.11
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
S&P Energy 100 130.77 164.47 206.00 207.11 246.45
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
12-31- 12-31- 12-31- 12-31- 12-31- 12-31-
94 95 96 97 98 99
------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Halliburton Company............ $100 $156.72 $198.23 $345.50 $200.08 $275.49
S&P 500........................ $100 $137.58 $169.16 $225.60 $290.08 $351.11
S&P Energy Composite........... $100 $130.77 $164.47 $206.00 $207.11 $246.45
19Composite
------------------- ------- --------------------
12-31-95 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00
12-31-96 $126.49 $122.96 $125.78
12-31-97 $220.46 $163.98 $157.53
12-31-98 $127.67 $210.85 $158.38
12-31-99 $175.79 $255.21 $188.47
12-31-00 $160.17 $231.95 $239.42
15
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation Long-Term Compensation
---------------------------------- ------------------------------
Awards Payouts
--------------------- --------
Restricted Securities
Other Annual Stock Underlying LTIP All Other
Name and Principal Salary Bonus Compensation Awards Options Payouts Compensation
Position Year Salary ($) ($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3) (#) ($)(4) ($)(5)
- ------------------ ---- ---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- -------- ------------
William E. Bradford .... 1999 $1,154,000 $1,235,375Richard B. Cheney....... 2000 $ 806,332 $1,451,398 -- $1,165,777$ 0 $231,097 $613,3200 N/A $100,775
Chairman of the Board 1999 1,283,000 0 -- 0 300,000 N/A 640,914
and Chief Executive 1998 1,001,000 1,672,7081,183,257 1,154,704 -- 1,886,086 72,804 231,097 436,0571,525,000 100,000 N/A 564,771
Officer of the Company
1997(6)
David J. Lesar.......... 2000 958,333 2,012,709 -- 1,216,250 300,000 N/A 478,515
President and Chief 1999 823,000 0 -- 0 260,100 N/A 349,265
Operating Officer of 1998 693,255 534,955 -- 1,525,000 65,000 N/A 308,524
the Company; Chairman
of the Board,
President and Chief
Executive Officer of
the Company (6)
Lester L. Coleman....... 2000 475,008 498,800 -- 417,000 39,000 N/A 137,837
Executive Vice 1999 450,000 0 -- 0 45,000 N/A 130,489
President and General 1998 412,506 225,000 -- 471,250 25,000 N/A 173,581
Counsel of the Company
Gary V. Morris.......... 2000 475,008 498,800 -- 834,000 39,000 N/A 171,005
Executive Vice 1999 450,000 0 -- 0 45,000 N/A 160,334
President and Chief 1998 337,500 225,000 -- 471,250 25,000 N/A 137,919
Financial Officer of
the Company
David A. Reamer......... 2000 350,004 367,539 -- 0 24,000 N/A 85,910
Senior Vice President 1999 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Richard B. Cheney ...... 1999 1,283,000 0 -- 0 300,000 N/A 640,914
Chief Executive Officer 1998 1,183,257 1,154,704 -- 1,525,000 100,000 N/A 564,771
of the Company 1997 1,100,000 1,980,000 -- 0 100,000 N/A 617,943
Lester L. Coleman ...... 1999 450,000 0 -- 0 45,000 N/A 130,489
Executive Vice(6) 1998 412,506 225,000 -- 471,250 25,000 N/A 173,581
President and
General Counsel of the 1997 390,000 390,000 -- 0 20,000 N/A 127,193
Company
David J. Lesar ......... 1999 823,000 0 -- 0 260,100 N/A 349,265
President and Chief 1998 693,255 534,955 -- 1,525,000 65,000 N/A 308,524
Operating
Officer of the Company 1997 500,000 650,000 -- 3,868,750 60,000 N/A 187,553
Gary V. Morris ......... 1999 450,000 0 -- 0 45,000 N/A 160,334
Executive Vice 1998 337,500 225,000 -- 471,250 25,000 N/A 137,919
President and
Chief Financial Officer 1997 291,670 291,670 -- 802,500 20,000 N/A 89,305
of the Company
Donald C. Vaughn ....... 1999 741,000 800,500 -- 81,588 0 N/A 135,397
Vice Chairman of the 1998 614,417 1,085,000 -- 1,668,155 18,037 N/A 173,569
Company 1997 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Donald C. Vaughn........ 2000 741,000 1,167,178 -- 205,158 0 $187,125 184,500
Vice Chairman of the 1999 741,000 800,500 -- 81,588 0 N/A 135,397
Company 1998 614,417 1,085,000 -- 1,668,155 18,037 N/A 173,569
- --------
(1) In 1998, the Compensation Committee approved a special one-time bonus for
selected officers and key employees, including Messrs. Cheney, Lesar,
Coleman,
Lesar and Morris. Messrs. Bradford andMr. Vaughn received the bonusesbonus earned under the
Dresser incentive compensation plan which werewas approved prior to the
Dresser merger. No bonuses were earned under the Annual Performance Pay
Plan in 1999. However, pursuant to Messrs. Bradford's andMr. Vaughn's employment agreements, theyagreement, he
received a 1999 paymentspayment equal to the average of the bonuses theybonus he earned under
Dresser's incentive compensation plan for Dresser's 1997 and 1998 fiscal years.year.
Bonus compensation earned by Messrs. Lesar, Coleman, Morris, Reamer and
Vaughn under the Executive Performance Plan for 2000 was paid in
restricted stock vesting over a 3-year period. The amounts shown in the
bonus column for such persons are equal to the fair market value of the
restricted stock as of December 31, 2000. Pursuant to the terms of the
Executive Performance Plan, Mr. Cheney received a lump sum cash payment
prorated through his retirement date.
(2) The dollar value of perquisites and other personal benefits for each of
the named executive officers was less than established reporting
thresholds.
(3) In 1997, Mr. Lesar was awarded 100,000 shares with restrictions lapsing
over a 10-year period and Mr. Morris was granted 20,000 shares with
restrictions lapsing over a 10-year period. In 1998, Messrs. Bradford, Cheney and Vaughn were each awarded 50,000 shares with
restrictions lapsing over 5 years; Mr. Lesar was granted 50,000 shares
with restrictions lapsing over 10 years; Mr. Coleman was granted 15,000
shares with restrictions lapsing over 10 years and Mr. Morris was granted
15,000 shares with restrictions lapsing over 10 years. In addition,
during 1998, Messrs.
Bradford andMr. Vaughn werewas issued 8,861 and 3,513 restricted shares,
respectively, under
restrictive incentive awards granted under Dresser's stock compensation
plan. Restrictions on those shares lapsed on the effective date of the
Dresser merger. During 1999, Messrs. Bradford andMr. Vaughn werewas issued 28,477 and 1,993 restricted
shares, respectively, under restrictive incentive awards granted under Dresser's stock
compensation plan. Restrictions on those shares lapse three years from
issue or upon retirement. In 2000, Mr. Lesar was granted 35,000 shares
with restrictions lapsing over 10 years; Mr. Coleman was granted 12,000
shares with restrictions lapsing over 10 years; and Mr. Morris was
granted 24,000 shares with restrictions lapsing over 10 years. In 2000,
Mr. Vaughn was issued
16
4,241 restricted shares under restrictive incentive awards granted under
Dresser's stock compensation plan. Restrictions on those shares lapse
three years from issue or upon retirement. Dividends are paid on the
restricted shares. The total number and value of restricted shares held by
each of the above individuals as of December 31, 19992000 were as follows:
Total Aggregate
Restricted Market
Name Shares Value
---- ---------- ----------
Mr. Bradford........................................ 68,477 $2,756,199Cheney*......................................... 0 $ --
Mr. Cheney.......................................... 140,000 5,635,000Lesar........................................... 181,000 6,561,250
Mr. Coleman......................................... 24,500 986,125
Mr. Lesar........................................... 165,000 6,641,25027,000 978,750
Mr. Morris.......................................... 42,400 1,706,60058,900 2,135,125
Mr. Reamer.......................................... 22,080 800,400
Mr. Vaughn.......................................... 41,993 1,690,21836,234 1,313,483
Dividends are paid--------
* Restrictions lapsed on the restricted shares.
20
140,000 shares with a market value of
$7,560,000 due to retirement on August 16, 2000.
(4) Halliburton does not have a long-term incentive program.program apart from stock
option and restricted stock grants. Mr. BradfordVaughn received a long-term
incentive paymentspayment in January 1998 and 19992000 under Dresser's performanceincentive stock unit
program.
(5) "All Other Compensation" includes the following accruals for or
contributions to various plans for the fiscal year ending December 31,
1999:2000: (i) company contributions to qualified defined contribution plans
for Mr. Cheney--$2,040, Mr. Lesar--$2,040, Mr. Coleman--$2,040, Mr.
Morris--$2,040, Mr. Reamer--$2,040 and Mr. Vaughn--$2,040; (ii) 401(k)
plan matching contributions for Mr. Bradford--Cheney --$6,400,6,800, Mr. Cheney--Lesar--$6,400,6,800,
Mr. Coleman--$6,400, Mr. Lesar--$6,400,6,800, Mr. Morris--$6,4006,800, Mr. Reamer--$6,800 and Mr.
Vaughn--$6,400; (ii)6,800; (iii) ERISA limitationrestoration accruals for Mr. Bradford--
$469,757,Cheney--
$53,692, Mr. Cheney--Lesar--$113,874,47,759, Mr. Coleman--$24,918, Mr. Lesar--$56,889,19,919, Mr. Morris--$26,60718,897;
Mr. Reamer--$11,811 and Mr. Vaughn--$19,800; (iii)71,318; (iv) supplemental
retirement plan contributions for Mr. Cheney--Lesar--$500,000,379,000, Mr. Coleman--$82,000,
$78,000, Mr. Lesar--Morris--$262,000124,000 and Mr. Morris--Reamer--$118,000; (iv)47,000; (v) above-market
earnings on ERISA limitationrestoration account for Mr. Bradford--Cheney--$46,195,6,866, Mr.
Cheney--Lesar--$5,076,4,695, Mr. Coleman--$2,855, Mr. Lesar--$2,214,4,694, Mr. Morris--$9382,060, Mr. Reamer--
$1,060 and Mr. Vaughn--
$13,898; (v)$20,266; (vi) above-market earnings on amounts
deferred under elective deferral plans for Mr. Bradford--Cheney--$28,882,31,377, Mr.
Cheney--Lesar--$15,564,38,221, Mr. Coleman--$14,316,26,384, Mr. Lesar--Morris --$21,762,17,208, Mr. Morris--$8,389Reamer--
$17,199 and Mr. Vaughn--
$9,480;$9,659; and (vi)(vii) company contributions to
executive life insurance premiums for Mr. Bradford--$62,086 and Mr. Vaughn--$14,920.18,326. Mr. Vaughn
was credited with earnings of $70,899$56,091 on his accrued balance under an
unfunded plan provided by a subsidiary in lieu of normal pension
benefits.
(6) Mr. Cheney retired from Halliburton on August 16, 2000 and Mr. Lesar
became Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
effective on that date. Mr. Reamer became an executive officer on May
16, 2000.
17
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
Potential Realizable Value
Number of % of Total at Assumed Annual Rates of
Securities Options Stock Price Appreciation
Individual Grants(1) Underlying Granted to Exercise for Option Term(2)
-------------------- Options Employees in Price Expiration ------------------------------------------------------------
Name Granted (#) Fiscal Year ($/Share) Date 5% 10%
---- ----------- ------------ --------- ---------- -------------- ----------------------------- ---------------
William E. Bradford.....Richard B. Cheney....... -0- -- -- -- -- --
Richard B. Cheney.......David J. Lesar.......... 300,000 5.3817.30 $ 39.5 12/2/200951.50 9/14/2010 $ 7,452,4019,716,422 $ 18,885,84824,623,321
Lester L. Coleman....... 45,000 .81 39.539,000 2.25 34.75 12/2/2009 1,117,860 2,832,877
David J. Lesar.......... 260,100 4.67 39.5 12/2/2009 6,461,232 16,374,0306/2010 852,309 2,159,919
Gary V. Morris.......... 45,000 .81 39.539,000 2.25 34.75 12/2/2009 1,117,860 2,832,8776/2010 852,309 2,159,919
David A. Reamer......... 24,000 1.38 34.75 12/6/2010 524,498 1,329,181
Donald C. Vaughn........ -0- -- -- -- -- --
All Optionees........... 5,571,6841,733,907 100.00 36.4594(3)41.6097(3) (3) 127,753,815 323,753,25045,373,080 114,984,295
All Stockholders........ N/A N/A N/A N/A 10,132,292,523 25,677,218,607(4)11,174,560,822 28,318,531,112(4)
- --------
(1) All options granted under the 1993 Plan are granted at the fair market
value of the Common Stock on the grant date and generally expire ten
years from the grant date. During employment options vest over a three
year period, with one-third of the shares becoming exercisable on each of
the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. The options
granted to designated executives are transferable by gift to individuals
and entities related to the optionee, subject to compliance with
guidelines adopted by the Compensation Committee.
(2) The assumed values result from the indicated rates of stock price
appreciation. Values were calculated based on a 10-year exercise period
for all grants. The actual value of the option grants is dependent on
future performance of the Common Stock. There is no assurance that the
values reflected in this table will be achieved. Halliburton did not use
an alternative formula for a grant date valuation, as it is not aware of
any formula that will determine with reasonable accuracy a present value
based on future unknown or volatile factors.
(3) The exercise price shown is a weighted average of all options granted in
1999.2000. Options expire on one or more of the following dates: January 6,
2009,4,
2010, January 11, 2009,31, 2010, February 27, 2009,7, 2010, February 16, 2010, February 18,
2010, February 22, 2010, February 28, 2010, March 1, 2009,8, 2010, March 10,
2010, April 3, 2010, April 4, 2010, April 7, 2010, April 14, 2010, April
24, 2010, May 3, 2010, May 10, 2010, May 15, 2010, May 16, 2010, May 17,
2010, May 18, 2010, May 23, 2009,
April 26, 2009, June 4, 2009, June 15, 2009, June 24, 2009,2010, July 12, 2010, July 14, 2009,2010, August
2, 2009,16, 2010, August 18, 2009,24, 2010, August 26, 2009, September 1, 2009,28, 2010, September 7, 2009,2010, September
8, 2009,2010, September 29, 2009,14, 2010, September 18, 2010, September 21, 2010,
October 21, 2009,3, 2010, October 4, 2010, October 9, 2010, October 24, 2010,
October 30, 2010, November 19, 2009, December 1, 2009, December 2, 2009,8, 2010, or December 6, 2009,
December 13, 2009, or December 30, 2009.2010.
(4) "All Stockholders" values are calculated using the weighted average
exercise price for all options awarded in 1999, $36.4594,2000, $41.6097, based on the
outstanding shares of Common Stock on December 31, 1999.
21
2000.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year- Value of Unexercised
Shares EndOptions at Fiscal Year-End In-the-Money Options at
Acquired Value (Shares) Fiscal Year-End ($)
on Exercise Realized ------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
Name (#) ($) Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable
---- ----------- ---------- ----------- ------------- -------------- ----------- -------------
William E. Bradford..... 142,396 $2,517,928 414,611 24,268 $ 656,235 $ 0
Richard B. Cheney....... 826,667 $21,964,254 200,000 233,333 $ 0 $270,831
David J. Lesar.......... 0 0 860,000 400,000 12,476,663 1,033,337362,036 495,066 2,092,753 176,036
Lester L. Coleman....... 10,000 259,063 157,667 68,333 2,313,913 235,837
David J. Lesar.......... 20,000 555,751 233,669 323,433 2,691,385 720,48828,000 836,500 159,667 77,333 1,352.794 126,206
Gary V. Morris.......... 0 0 98,667 68,333 1,381,100 235,837128,667 77,333 1,107,482 126,206
David A. Reamer......... 0 0 84,500 50,500 606,375 96,938
Donald C. Vaughn........ 9,995 199,288 260,830 6,012 1,452,640171,705 3,090,559 95,137 0 0 0
2218
RETIREMENT PLANS
Executives of Halliburton are participating or have participated in several
defined benefit pension plans of the company. Mr. Cheney iswas covered by the
Halliburton Retirement Plan (the "Floor Plan"). prior to his retirement in
August of 2000. Messrs. Coleman, Lesar, Morris and MorrisReamer were covered by the
Floor Plan but their participation was discontinued and all benefits
distributed in 1997 and 1998 as discussed below. Messrs.
Bradford andMr. Vaughn areis covered by the
Dresser Industries, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan which is a non-qualifiednon-
qualified plan and by specifica frozen defined benefit plansplan that werewas sponsored by a
former Dresser or its subsidiaries.subsidiary.
The purpose of the Floor Plan was to provide a floor for retirement benefits
provided under the Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and Savings Plan. Effective as of
December 31, 1996, benefit accruals under the Floor Plan ceased for all
employees except those that were age 55 or over ("Grandfathered Employees").
The portion of the Floor Plan attributable to employees other than
Grandfathered Employees terminated effective February 28, 1997 and all accrued
benefits payable to participants were distributed in 1998. Mr. Cheney was a
Grandfathered Employee while Messrs. Coleman, Lesar, Morris and MorrisReamer were
not.
The Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and Savings Plan is intended to be the primary
plan to provide retirement benefits to participating employees. Halliburton
makes annual contributions to the Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and Savings Plan. The
Planplan provides a dollar of company matching contributions for every dollar of
employee contributions up to a maximum of 4% of "Compensation". "Compensation"
for this purpose was limited to $160,000$170,000 in 19992000 by Internal Revenue Code
Section 401(a)(17). In addition, each year Halliburton may make discretionary
profit sharing contributions. These contributions may not exceed the maximum
amount deductible under Section 404 of the Internal Revenue Code. It is not
possible to estimate the amount of benefits payable at retirement under the
Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and Savings Plan because of some or all of the
following:
. profit sharing amounts contributed in the future are discretionary and
will be contingent on future profits;
. earnings on trust fund assets will vary;
. trust fund assets may appreciate or depreciate in value;
. the compensation of the individual may vary;
. age at date of retirement may vary; and
. the Planplan may be changed or discontinued.
The Floor Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan established as of
January 1, 1991 as a floor plan integrated with the Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and
Savings Plan to provide an adequate level of retirement benefits for employees.
Prior to January 1, 1997, the terms of the Floor Plan provided for a monthly
pension payment equal to the following amount: (i) 1 1/3% of an employee's
average monthly base compensation, computed over the highest three calendar
year period, multiplied by the employee's years of accrual service after
January 1, 1990; minus (ii) a pension which is the actuarial equivalent of the
participant's eligible profit sharing accounts, excluding any employer and
employee contributions under the employee matched savings portion of the
program, accumulated since January 1, 1990 under the Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and
Savings Plan. The offset for the Halliburton Profit SharingRetirement and Savings Plan was
based upon the 1984 Unisex Pension Mortality Table and an 8 1/2% interest
assumption. As a result of the termination of the Floor Plan for employees
other than Grandfathered Employees, the employees received a distribution of
the Floor Plan benefit, if any, in 1998. The Floor Plan will continue for
Grandfathered Employees under the same formula as in effect prior to 1997
except that a Grandfathered Employee's Floor Plan benefit will never be less
than the value of the benefit determined as of January 1, 1997 increased with
interest. The value of the grandfathered Floor Plan benefits calculated as of December 31,
1999 for
Mr. Cheney isat his retirement was $0.
The benefits for Mr. Cheney have been computed on
the assumptions that:
. payments will be paid in the form of a life annuity;
. employment will continue until normal retirement at age 65;
. levels of creditable compensation will remain constant; and
. offsetable defined contribution allocations will average 7% of pay per
year or more.
2319
For Messrs. Bradford andMr. Vaughn, the estimated total annual retirement benefits payable under
defined benefit pension plans are set forth below:
Pension Plan Table
Years of Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
- ------------ -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$1,000,000 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $ 400,000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 600,000
1,150,000 115,000 230,000 345,000 460,000 575,000 690,000 690,000
1,300,000 130,000 260,000 390,000 520,000 650,000 780,000 780,000
1,450,000 145,000 290,000 435,000 580,000 725,000 870,000 870,000
1,600,000 160,000 320,000 480,000 640,000 800,000 960,000 960,000
1,800,000 180,000 360,000 540,000 720,000 900,000 1,080,000 1,080,000
2,000,000 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000
2,200,000 220,000 440,000 660,000 880,000 1,100,000 1,320,000 1,320,000
2,400,000 240,000 480,000 720,000 960,000 1,200,000 1,440,000 1,440,000
2,600,000 260,000 520,000 780,000 1,040,000 1,300,000 1,560,000 1,560,000
2,800,000 280,000 560,000 840,000 1,120,000 1,400,000 1,680,000 1,680,000
3,000,000 300,000 600,000 900,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 1,800,000
3,200,000 320,000 640,000 960,000 1,280,000 1,600,000 1,920,000 1,920,000
The gross amounts represented above include sums accrued under Halliburton's
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans. Amounts credited to
qualified and non-qualified defined contribution plans, however, will be paid
from those plans and thus represent deductions to the above gross amounts.
Likewise, "pension benefit equivalents" credited under the deferred
compensation plan also represent deductions.
The benefit payable to Mr.
Bradford is subject to a special minimum calculation but, at this time, it is
not anticipated that the minimum will apply.
The compensation used to determine pension benefits for Messrs. Bradford andMr. Vaughn is within
10% of the amounts shown in the salary and bonus columns of the Summary
Compensation Table. YearsThe years of credited service as of December 31, 1999 used2000 in
determining benefits for these individuals are as follows: Mr.
Bradford, 36.42 years and Mr. Vaughn 4.12is 5.12 years. Benefits are computed as
straight-life annuity amounts that may be paid in various forms.
In addition to the benefits described above for Mr. Vaughn, he is due an
additional $84,792 per year at age 65 from the defined benefit pension plan of
a Halliburton subsidiary. This plan benefit is substantially frozen and does
not reflect future pay or service. The benefit is stated as a straight-life
annuity, but various other optional forms are available.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND
CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Employment Contracts
Mr. Cheney. As previously noted, Mr. Cheney resigned from Halliburton and
took early retirement in August 2000 to run as the Republican Party's Vice
Presidential nominee. Other than the continuing obligations discussed below,
the terms of Mr. Cheney's employment agreement with Halliburton provides forterminated at
that time. No severance benefits were paid to Mr. Cheney under his employment
as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer until
September 30, 2003. Under the agreement Mr. Cheney's cash compensation was
specified for two periods. The first is for the period from August 10, 1995,
the effective date of the agreement,since he elected to December 31, 1995. The second is for
the period beginning on January 1, 1996 and ending September 30, 2003. During
the first period,resign. Compensation Mr. Cheney received as a
salary,result of his retirement is described in the aggregate, of $250,000;
a bonus of $150,000, in lieu of participation in Halliburton's Annual
Performance Pay Plan; and a Supplemental Retirement Benefit contribution of
$125,000 under the SEDC Plan. During the second period,next section, Arrangements
Relating to Executive Officer Retirement.
Mr. Cheney will receive
an annual salary of not less than $1,000,000; will participate in the Annual
Performance Pay Plan beginning with the 1996 plan year; and will receive a
Supplemental Retirement
24
Benefit contribution under the SEDC Plan of at least $500,000 annually. Also,
pursuant to the terms of the agreement, on August 10, 1995 Mr. Cheney was
granted a non-qualified stock option to purchase up to 400,000 shares of
Halliburton's Common Stock at $21.00 per share (the fair market value on such
date). Effective October 1, 1995 he was awarded 200,000 shares of Common Stock
subject to restrictions. (The share amounts and exercise price have been
adjusted to reflect the 2-for-1 stock split in 1997.) Both the stock option
grant and the restricted stock award were made under the 1993 Plan. The
employment agreement also provided for Halliburton to reimburse Mr. Cheney for
expenses associated with his relocation to Dallas.
His employment agreement provides for specific payments in the event of Mr.
Cheney's termination for any reason other than his voluntary termination (as
defined in the agreement), death, disability or his termination by Halliburton
for cause. Under these circumstances, Halliburton is obligated to pay Mr.
Cheney a severance payment consisting of a lump sum cash payment equal to the
value of any restricted shares that were granted pursuant to the terms of the
agreement and are forfeited because of the termination of his employment plus
the lesser of:
. 150 percent of the base salary that he would have received between the
date of the termination of employment and the end of the term of the
agreement; or
. $3 million.
Mr. Cheney'shas continuing obligations to Halliburton after termination, including
non-competition obligations, are consideration for any severance payment that
may be made under his employment
agreement.agreement, including non-competition and confidentiality obligations.
20
Mr. Lesar. Mr. Lesar entered into an employment agreement with Halliburton as
of August 1, 1995 providingwhich provided for his employment as Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Halliburton. The agreement also provides that,
while Mr. Lesar is employed by Halliburton, management will recommend to the
Compensation Committee:
. annual supplemental retirement benefit allocations under the SEDCSenior
Executives' Deferred Compensation Plan; and
. annual grants of stock options under the 1993 Plan.
These recommendations are to be consistent with the criteria utilized by the
Compensation Committee for similarly situated executives.
Under the terms of his employment agreement, in the event Mr. Lesar is
involuntarily terminated by Halliburton for any reason other than termination
for cause (as defined in the agreement), Halliburton is obligated to pay Mr.
Lesar a severance payment equal to:
. the value of any restricted shares granted under the 1993 Plan and that are forfeited because of
termination; and
. five times his annual base salary.
Mr. Vaughn. In connection with Halliburton's merger with Dresser Industries,
Inc., on September 29, 1998, Halliburton entered into an employment contract
with Mr. Vaughn which provided for his employment as Vice Chairman of
Halliburton until March 31, 2001.
The employment agreement further provides for:
. an annual base salary of not less than $600,000;
. payment of the bonus earned by him under the Dresser 1998 Executive
Incentive Compensation Plan for the fiscal year ending October 31,
1998, as well as a bonus calculated in the same manner as provided in
the plan for the two months ended December 31, 1998;
. participation in the Halliburton Annual Performance Pay Plan commencing
on January 1, 1999, subject to a minimum payment equal to the average
annual amount earned during fiscal years 1997 and 1998 under Dresser's
incentive compensation plan;
. participation in the 1993 Plan;
. continued participation in Dresser's Supplemental Executive Retirement
Plan (which was adopted by Halliburton); and
. participation in other employee benefit plans made generally available
to Halliburton's executive employees.
In addition, Halliburton affirmed its obligations under the Dresser merger
agreement with respect to the Dresser employee benefit plans. As a consequence,
Halliburton assumed the stock options held by Mr. Vaughn and it honored his
participation in the Dresser Deferred Compensation Plan, the Dresser
Performance Stock Unit Program, the Dresser Executive Life Insurance Program,
the Dresser Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the M. W. Kellogg
retirement plan and the Dresser Retiree Medical Benefit Plan.
Under the employment agreement, if Mr. Vaughn's employment is terminated
before the end of the term for any reason other than death, "voluntary
termination" or "cause" (as those terms are defined in the agreement), he will
nevertheless continue to receive all compensation and benefits through the end
of the term. If, Mr. Vaughn's employment is terminated through death,
"voluntary termination" or "cause", however, he will be entitled to receive
only:
. his base salary pro rated through the date of termination;
21
. individual bonuses and individual incentive compensation payable for
prior years (but not for the year of the termination); and
. benefits payable pursuant to the terms of Dresser's and Halliburton's
employee benefit plans (including any stock, stock option, incentive
compensation and deferred compensation plans).
Mr. Vaughn is obligated under the employment agreement to refrain from
competing with Halliburton for one year after termination of employment.
Messrs. Coleman and Morris. Messrs. Coleman and Morris entered into
employment agreements with Halliburton effective September 29, 1998, providing
for their employment as Executive Vice President and General Counsel, and
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. Each
executive's employment agreement further provides that he will receive an
annual base salary of not less than $450,000 and will participate in
Halliburton's Annual Performance Pay Plan. Also, each executive was granted an
award under the 1993 Plan of 15,000 shares of Common Stock subject to
restrictions.
Under the terms of the employment agreements, in the event of either
executive's termination for any reason other than voluntary termination (as
defined in the agreement), death, permanent disability, retirement (either at
or after age 65 or voluntarily prior to such age), or termination by
Halliburton for cause (as defined in the agreement), Halliburton is obligated
to pay the executive amake severance payment consisting of a lump sum cash paymentpayments equal to:
. the value of any restricted shares that were forfeited because of the
termination;
. two years' base salary;
25
. any unpaid bonus earned in prior years; and
. any bonus payable for the year in which his employment is terminated
determined as if he had remained employed for the full year.
Messrs. Bradford and Vaughn. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of February 25, 1998 relating to the Dresser merger, HalliburtonMr. Reamer. Mr. Reamer entered into an employment contractsagreement with Messrs. BradfordHalliburton
and VaughnHalliburton's subsidiary, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. ("HESI"), on
September 29, 1998, which became
effective upon the effective dateprovided for his employment as Senior Vice President
of the merger.Shared Services division of HESI. Mr. Bradford became ChairmanReamer's employment agreement also
provides for an annual salary of not less than $325,000 and participation in
Halliburton's BoardAnnual Performance Pay Plan. In addition, Mr. Reamer was granted
7,500 restricted shares under the 1993 Plan.
Under the terms of Directorsthe employment agreement, in the event of Mr. Reamer's
termination for any reason other than voluntary termination (as defined in the
agreement), death, permanent disability, retirement (either at age 65 or
voluntarily prior to such age), or termination by Halliburton for cause (as
defined in the agreement), HESI is obligated to make severance payments equal
to:
. the value of any restricted shares that were forfeited because of the
termination;
. two years' base salary;
. any unpaid bonus earned in prior years; and
. any bonus payable for the year in which his employment is terminated
determined as if he had remained employed for the full year.
Arrangements Relating to Executive Officer Retirement
Mr. Vaughn became Vice Chairman of
Halliburton. Each of Messrs. Bradford and Vaughn were also appointed to serve
on Halliburton's Executive Committee along with Messrs. Cheney and Lesar.
The employment agreements provide that Mr. Bradford will serveretired as Chairman of the Board and that Mr. Vaughn will serve as Vice Chairman of Halliburton. The
employment agreements further provide for:
. terms that commence at the effective date of the Dresser merger and end,
in the case of Mr. Bradford, on January 31, 2000 and, in the case of Mr.
Vaughn, on March 31, 2001;
. base salaries of $925,000 and $600,000 for Messrs. Bradford and Vaughn,
respectively;
. payment to each of the bonus earned by him under the Dresser 1998Chief Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for the fiscal year ending October
31, 1998, as well as a bonus calculated in the same manner as provided
in the plan for the two months ended December 31, 1998;
. participation by each in the Halliburton Annual Performance Pay Plan
commencing on January 1, 1999, subject to a minimum payment equal to the
average annual amount earned during fiscal years 1997 and 1998 under
Dresser's incentive compensation plan;
. participation by each in the 1993 Plan;
. continued participation by each in Dresser's Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (which was adopted by Halliburton); and
. participation by each in those other employee benefit plans made
generally available to Halliburton's executive employees.
In addition, Halliburton has in the employment agreements affirmed its
obligations under the Dresser merger agreement with respect to the Dresser
employee benefit plans. As a consequence, Halliburton assumed the stock options
held by Messrs. Bradford and Vaughn and it honored the participation by each in
the Dresser Deferred Compensation Plan, the Dresser Performance Stock Unit
Program, the Dresser Executive Life Insurance Program, the Dresser Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan, the Dresser Retirement Plan (in the case of Mr.
Bradford) and the M. W. Kellogg retirement plans (in the case of Mr. Vaughn)
and the Dresser Retiree Medical Benefit Plan. Under the employment agreements,
each executive will continue to receive all compensation and benefits set out
above through the end of the employment term if his employment is terminated
for a reason other than death, a "voluntary termination" or for "cause" (as
these terms are defined in the agreements). If the executive's employment is
terminated through death, "voluntary termination" or "cause", however, he will
be entitled to receive only:
. his base salary pro rated through the date of termination;
. any individual bonuses and individual incentive compensation payable for
prior years (but not for the year of the termination); and
. any benefits payable pursuant to the terms of Dresser's and
Halliburton's employee benefit plans (including any stock, stock option,
incentive compensation and deferred compensation plans).
Each executive is obligated under the employment agreement to refrain from
competing with Halliburton for one year after termination of employment.
Halliburton also entered into an Indemnification Agreement with Mr. Bradford
indemnifying him against liability incurred in his capacity as a Director and
officerOfficer of
Halliburton to the extent permitted by Delaware law.
26
Arrangements Relating to Executive Officer Retirementson August 16, 2000. In connection with Mr. Bradford'sCheney's retirement, the
Board approved retention of his employment agreement was
supplemented and amendedoutstanding stock options on a total of
1,160,000 shares of Halliburton common stock as of December 2, 1999, to:
. extend the termpermitted under his option
agreements. At that time, 400,000 of the 1,160,000 option shares were unvested.
Under the terms of his stock option
22
agreements, the unvested options did not automatically vest on retirement, but
instead continue to vest over the normal three-year vesting period applicable
to each grant. Currently, Mr. Cheney has outstanding options for 433,333
shares, 233,333 of which are unvested. Mr. Cheney has entered into an
irrevocable agreement to February 29, 2000, at which time he
would retire as a Halliburton employee;
. provide fordonate to charity the after-tax proceeds from the
exercise of all of his resignation as Chairman ofoutstanding options. Under the Board, as a member ofagreement, Mr. Cheney
gave an administrative agent total discretion to decide when to exercise the
Board of Directors and from all other positionsoptions, without consultation with Halliburton or its
affiliates on January 31, 2000; and
. provide him with office space and part-time secretarial support for a
five-year period.Mr. Cheney. Also, as a result of Mr.
Bradford'sCheney's retirement, restrictions lapsed on 68,477140,000 shares of Common Stock.common stock. The
fair market value of the shares on February 29,August 16, 2000 was $2,614,965.$7,560,000. In addition,
pursuant to the terms of the Executive Performance Plan, Mr. Cheney received a
prorated 2000 bonus in the amount shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
Change-In-Control Arrangements
Pursuant to the 1993 Plan, in the event of a change-in-control:
A. The Compensation Committee, acting in its sole discretion, will act to
effect one or more of the following alternatives for outstanding stock options:
. accelerate the time at which options may be exercised;
. cancel the options and pay the optionees the excess of the per share
value offered to stockholders in the change-in-control transaction over
the exercise price(s) of the shares subject to options;
. make adjustments to the options as deemed appropriate to reflect the
change-in-control; or
. convert the options to rights to purchase a proportionate amount of
shares of stock or other securities or property paid to stockholders in
the change-in-control transaction.
B. The Compensation Committee may provide for full vesting of all shares of
outstanding restricted stock and termination of all restrictions applicable to
the restricted stock.
Pursuant to the Career Executive Incentive Stock Plan, the Compensation
Committee may, in the event of a tender offer for all or a part of
Halliburton's Common Stock, accelerate the lapse of restrictions on any or all
shares on which restrictions have not previously lapsed.
Under the AnnualExecutive Performance Pay Plan,Plan:
. in the event of a change-in-control during a plan year, a participant
will be entitled to an immediate cash payment. The payment will be equal to the maximum
dollar amount a participant would have been entitled to for the year
multiplied by 125% and prorated through the date of the change-in-control. All deferred amountschange-in-
control, and
. in the event of a change-in-control after the end of a plan year but
before the payment date, a participant will be entitled to an immediate
cash payment equal to 125% of the incentive earned in prior years shall be paid in cash immediately.for the plan year.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Dresser has outstanding approximately $6.1 million in letters of credit under
a bank facility that was established in connection with some insurance
relationships of NL Industries, Inc., of which Mr. Martin is a director and
executive officer. NL is obligated to indemnify Dresser for any losses or
expenses in respect of these letters of credit.
23
DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION, RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN AND RETIREMENT PLAN
Directors' Fees and Deferred Compensation Plan
All non-employee Directors receive an annual fee of $30,000 and an attendance
fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors. The Directors also
receive an attendance fee of $2,000 per meeting for 27
Committee service. The
Chairmen of the Audit; Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance;
Health, Safety and Environment; and Management Oversight Committees each
receive an additional $2,000$10,000 annually. Under the Directors' Deferred
Compensation Plan, Directors are permitted to defer their fees, or a portion of
their fees, until after they cease to be a Director. A participant may elect,
on a prospective basis, to have his or her deferred compensation account either
credited quarterly with interest at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. or
translated on a quarterly basis into Common Stockcommon stock equivalents. Distribution
will be made in cash either in a lump sum or in annual installments over a 5- or 10-year10-
year period, as determined by the committee appointed to administer the Planplan in
its discretion. Ms. Armstrong andDistributions of common stock equivalents are made in shares of
common stock, while distributions of deferred compensation credited with
interest are made in cash. Messrs. Crandall, DiBona, Eagleburger, Hunt Precourt and
StegemeierPrecourt have elected to participate in the Plan.plan.
Directors' Restricted Stock Plan
Pursuant to the terms of the Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, which was approved by the stockholders at the 1993 Annual Meeting,
each non-employee Director receives an annual award of 400 restricted shares of
Common Stockcommon stock as a part of his or her compensation. The awards are in addition
to the Directors' annual retainer and attendance fees and to amounts that would
be payable under the Directors' Retirement Plan, described below.fees. Shares awarded under the Non-Employee
Directors' Restricted Stock Plan may not be sold, assigned, pledged or
otherwise transferred or encumbered until the restrictions are removed.
Restrictions will be removed following termination of Board service under
specified circumstances, which include, among others, death or disability,
retirement under the Director mandatory retirement policy, or early retirement
after at least four years of service. During the restriction period, Directors
have the right to vote, and to receive dividends on, the restricted shares. Any
shares that under the plan's provisions remain restricted following termination
of service will be forfeited.
Directors' Stock Options
At the 2000 Annual Meeting, the stockholders approved an amendment to the
1993 Plan that, among other things, broadened the eligibility provisions to
permit non-employee Directors to be granted awards under the plan. Under the
new stock option program for non-employee Directors:
. Each Director elected after the 2000 Annual Meeting will receive an
option for 5,000 shares of Halliburton common stock at the time of
initial election to the Board and an option for 2,000 shares each year
thereafter at the time of the Director's reelection. The option grants
are in lieu of benefits under the Directors' Retirement Plan (discussed
below) which is closed to Directors elected after the 2000 Annual
Meeting.
. Each Director who continues to participate in the Directors' Retirement
Plan will receive an annual option for 1,000 shares at the time of
reelection to the Board.
. Each "grandfathered" Director who opted out of the Directors'
Retirement Plan (Messrs. Hunt, Martin and Precourt) received a one-time
option grant for 5,000 shares and will receive an annual option for
2,000 shares at the time of reelection.
Options granted under the stock option program:
. have an exercise price equal to the closing price of Halliburton's
common stock on the grant date,
. become exercisable six months after the grant date, and
24
. are exercisable for 10 years from the date of grant or three years
after termination of service, whichever is the shorter period.
Directors' Retirement Plan
As noted above, the Directors' Retirement Plan has been closed to new
Directors elected after May 16, 2000 (the date of last year's Annual Meeting).
Each individual who was serving as a non-employee Director on May 16, 2000
continued to be eligible to participate in the plan but had a one-time right to
opt out of the plan and receive the same level of option grants as a new
Director. Messrs. Hunt, Martin and Precourt elected to cease participation in
the plan in exchange for the right to receive additional grants of options.
Under the terms of theDirectors' Retirement Plan, for Directors of Halliburton,each non-employee Director who
continues as a non-
employee Director participant receiveswill receive an annual benefit upon the benefit
commencement date. The benefit commencement date (theis the later of a
participant's termination date or attainment of age 65).65. The benefit will be
equal to the last annual retainer for the participant for a period of years
equal to the participant's years of service on his or her termination date. The
minimum benefit payment period for each participant is 5 years. Non-employee Directors become participants in the
Directors' Retirement Plan upon the completion of three years of service, as
defined in the plan. Upon the death
of a participant, benefit payments will be made to the surviving spouse, if
any, over the remainder of the retirement benefit payment period. Years of
service for each Director participant under the Planplan are: Ms. Armstrong--23, Lord Clitheroe-- 13,Clitheroe--14,
Mr. Crandall--15,Crandall--16, Mr. Howell--9,DiBona--4, Mr. Lewis--4,Eagleburger--3, Mr. Silas--7Howell--10, and Mr.
Stegemeier--6.Silas--8. Assets are transferred to State Street Bank and Trust Company, as
Trustee, to be held pursuant to the terms of an irrevocable grantor trust to
aid Halliburton in meeting its obligations under the Directors' Retirement
Plan. The corpus and income of the trust are treated as assets and income of
Halliburton for federal income tax purposes and are subject to the claims of
general creditors of Halliburton to the extent provided in the Plan.plan.
SECTION 16 (a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
The rules promulgated under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, require Halliburton's officers and Directors, and persons who
own more than 10 percent of a registered class of Halliburton's equity
securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange and to
furnish Halliburton with copies. HalliburtonDue to the Dresser merger, the third party
administrator of the Dresser Deferred Compensation Plan inadvertently failed to
informreport to Halliburton the reinvestment of dividends paid on contingent stock
units held by Mr. Cheney of the
conversion to cash of 8,350 and 10,930 stock equivalent units awarded under the
Halliburton Company Annual Performance Pay Plan.Vaughn. As a result of this failure, Mr. CheneyVaughn inadvertently
failed to report the conversionsreinvestment of dividends on a timely basis.
28AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Halliburton's Audit Committee of the Board of Directors consists of directors
who, in the business judgment of the Board of Directors, are independent under
the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. In addition, in the business
judgment of the Board of Directors, at least one of us has accounting or
related financial management experience required under the listing standards.
We operate under a written charter, a copy of which is included as Appendix A
to this proxy statement. As required by the charter, we review and reassess the
charter annually and recommend any changes to the Board of Directors for
approval.
Under the charter, Halliburton's management is responsible for preparing
Halliburton's financial statements and the independent auditors are responsible
for auditing those financial statements. The Audit Committee's role under the
charter is to provide oversight of management's responsibility. The Audit
Committee is not providing any expert or special assurance as to Halliburton's
financial statements or any professional certification as to the independent
auditor's work.
In fulfilling our oversight role for the year ended December 31, 2000, we:
. reviewed and discussed Halliburton's audited financial statements with
management;
25
. discussed with Arthur Andersen LLP, Halliburton's independent auditors,
the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 relating
to the conduct of the audit;
. received from Arthur Andersen the written disclosures and letter
required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1; and
. discussed with Arthur Andersen its independence.
Based on our:
. review of the audited financial statements,
. discussions with management,
. discussions with Arthur Andersen, and
. review of Arthur Andersen's written disclosures and letter,
we recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements
be included in Halliburton's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS
Robert L. Crandall
Lawrence S. Eagleburger
W. R. Howell
Ray L. Hunt
C. J. Silas
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Arthur
Andersen LLP for the audit of Halliburton's annual financial statements for
fiscal year 2000 and the reviews of Halliburton's financial statements included
in Halliburton's Forms 10-Q for fiscal year 2000 totaled $7.4 million.
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
The aggregate fees billed for the professional services as financial
information systems design and implementation rendered by Arthur Andersen LLP
for fiscal year 2000 totaled $1.5 million which consisted primarily of:
. $730,000 for an intercompany project, and
. $700,000 for a tax database project.
In addition, Accenture's (formerly known as Andersen Consulting) aggregate fees
billed for systems design and implementation for the period from January 1,
2000 through August 7, 2000 were $36.1 million dollars.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed for services rendered in year 2000 by Arthur
Andersen LLP, other than the services covered in the paragraphs above headed
Audit Fees and Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
totaled $6.5 million which primarily consisted of:
. $3.8 million of tax services, and
26
. $2.7 million of special projects which consisted primarily of:
. $950,000 for work related to the sale of the Dresser Equipment
Group business, primarily for audited financial statements of the
Group,
. $700,000 for work related to worldwide benefit plans,
. $400,000 for due diligence related work, and
. $600,000 for small projects, none of which were greater than
$40,000.
Audit Committee Consideration
Halliburton's Audit Committee considered whether Arthur Andersen LLP's
provision of Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees and
All Other Fees as reported above is compatible with maintaining Arthur Andersen
LLP's independence as Halliburton's principal independent accounting firm.
Work Performed by Principal Accountant's Full Time, Permanent Employees
Arthur Andersen's work on Halliburton's audit was performed by full time,
permanent employees and partners of Arthur Andersen.
PROPOSAL FOR RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF AUDITORS
(Item 2)
Arthur Andersen LLP has examined Halliburton's financial statements since
1946. A resolution will be presented at the Annual Meeting to ratify the
appointment by the Board of Directors of that firm as independent accountants
to examine the financial statements and the books and records of Halliburton
for the year ending December 31, 2000.2001. The appointment was made upon the
recommendation of the Audit Committee. Arthur Andersen LLP has advised that
neither the firm nor any member of the firm havehas any direct financial interest
or any material indirect interest in Halliburton. Also, during at least the
past three years, neither the firm nor any member of the firm has had any
connection with Halliburton in the capacity of promoter, underwriter, voting
trustee, Director, officer or employee.
Representatives of Arthur Andersen are expected to be present at the Annual
Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so
and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from
stockholders.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Halliburton's Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to
vote on the matter is needed to approve the proposal.
If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Arthur Andersen LLP, the
Board of Directors will reconsider the selection of independent accountants.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment
of Arthur Andersen LLP as independent accountants to examine the financial
statements and books and records of Halliburton for the year 2000.2001.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO AMEND AND RESTATE THE
1993 STOCK AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANON MYANMAR (BURMA)
(Item 3)
Introduction
On February 18, 1993,The Amalgamated Bank of New York LongView Collective Investment Fund (the
"LongView Fund"), located at 11-15 Union Square, New York, NY 10003, has
notified Halliburton that it intends to present the
27
resolution set forth below to the Annual Meeting for action by the
stockholders. LongView Fund's supporting statement for the resolution, along
with the Board of Directors' statement in opposition is set forth below. As of
December 6, 2000, LongView Fund beneficially owned 144,091 shares of
Halliburton's common stock. Proxies solicited on behalf of the Board of
Directors adopted thewill be voted AGAINST this proposal unless stockholders specify a
contrary choice in their proxies.
Proposal
RESOLVED: The shareholders of Halliburton Company 1993 Stock and Long-Term Incentive Plan("Halliburton" or the
"Company") urge the Board of Directors to create a committee of independent
directors to prepare a report at reasonable expense that was subsequently approveddescribes projects
undertaken by the stockholdersCompany or any subsidiary in Burma, with an emphasis on May 18, 1993.what
steps have been and are being taken to assure that neither Halliburton nor any
of its subsidiaries is involved in or appears to benefit from the use of forced
labor or other human rights abuses in Burma.
Supporting Statement
Burma has been ruled for over a decade by a military dictatorship widely
condemned for human rights abuses. The U.S. government has banned new
investment in Burma, and many U.S. companies, including Texaco and Atlantic
Richfield, have voluntarily withdrawn from the country. Halliburton, however,
remains one of the last U.S. companies with an office in Burma.
The United Nations, the U.S. Department of Labor, the International Labor
Organization and various human rights groups have published reports on forced
labor and other human-rights violations in Burma, with particular reference to
the Yadana gas pipeline project.
Halliburton participated in constructing the Yadana pipeline. According to an
October 2000 Wall Street Journal article, European Marine Contractors, a
Halliburton subsidiary, contracted in 1997 to lay 365 kilometers of the
pipeline undersea. A totalreport by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Burma
found that Burmese villagers were forced to work on offshore portions of 11,000,000 sharesthe
Yadana project. EarthRights International, a human rights organization,
reported that "from 1992 until the present, thousands of Halliburton's
Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share,villagers in Burma
were initially authorizedforced to work in support of these pipelines and related infrastructure,
were raped, tortured and killed by soldiers hired by the companies as security
guards for issuancethe pipeline." The Journal reported that Halliburton refused to
comment on whether it was aware of human rights concerns in Burma.
At least one U.S. company doing business in Burma was sued by victims of
forced labor. In a case filed against Unocal involving the Yadana project, a
federal judge found that "the evidence does suggest that Unocal knew that
forced labor was being utilized and that the Joint Venturers [including Unocal]
benefited from the practice." The lawsuit was dismissed for failure to meet the
requirements of the Alien Tort Claims Act. Even so, a judicial finding that a
company knew forced labor was being used can damage a company's reputation.
Fifty years after World War II, companies still face litigation by victims of
forced labor under the 1993 Plan,Nazi regime. The German government recently established
a $4.6 billion compensation fund with funding to come from companies that
benefited from forced labor, including U.S.-based companies Ford and General
Motors. Any involvement in human rights abuses can thus come back to haunt
companies years later.
We believe that Halliburton shareholders are entitled to an independent
assessment of which no more than 3,200,000 could be issuedthe Company's activities in the
form of restricted stock awards. (All share amounts inBurma insofar as they relate to human
rights issues there.
We urge you to vote FOR this Introduction
section have been adjusted, where applicable, to reflect the 2-for-1 stock
split distributed on July 21, 1997.)
In early 1997, there were only about 440,000 shares remaining available for
issuance under the Plan.resolution.
The Board of Directors determinedrecommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the
following reasons:
. Halliburton's activities in Myanmar (Burma) represent a tiny fraction of
Halliburton's overall business operations.
28
. Halliburton's limited operations in Myanmar have been performed primarily
by personnel sourced from outside Myanmar.
Halliburton's operations in Myanmar are immaterial. For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999, Myanmar represented approximately $21 thousand of
Halliburton's total assets of $10.7 billion or 0.0002%; approximately $120
thousand of Halliburton's net earnings of $438 million or 0.03%; and
approximately $1.1 million of Halliburton's gross sales of $14.9 billion or
0.007%.
Halliburton employs only one Myanmar national in its limited operations in
Myanmar. All other personnel on Halliburton projects come from outside the
country. Therefore, there is absolutely no basis for attributing human rights
abuses to Halliburton's activities.
While the Board shares the Proponent's concern about human rights abuses in
countries such as Myanmar, Halliburton has not engaged in, or condoned, such
conduct. Thus, the requested report will serve only to increase administrative
burdens and costs.
Halliburton's Code of Business Conduct requires all employees and agents to
practice honesty and integrity in every aspect of their dealings with other
Halliburton employees, customers, suppliers and the public and to treat those
persons with dignity and respect.
As a company that operates in over 100 countries around the world, our
customers, partners, suppliers and employees represent virtually every race or
national origin and an associated multitude of religions, cultures, customs,
political philosophies and languages. We must, and do, respect this diversity
and realize that neither the United States nor we can impose its values on the
world.
It is not our purpose to remake the world in the image of any particular
political, moral or religious philosophy with which we are comfortable. Rather,
we hope to help improve the quality of life wherever we do business by serving
as a developer of natural resources and infrastructures.
Regarding allegations of violations of human rights by the government of
Myanmar, we believe that decisions as to the nature of such governments and
their actions are better made by governmental authorities and international
entities such as the United Nations as opposed to individual persons or
companies. Where the United States government has mandated that United States
companies refrain from commerce, we comply, often to the advantage of our
international competitors. History has shown that single country, let alone
corporate boycotts and sanctions, are ineffective, often injuring the economic
interests of the boycotting entity.
We do not always agree with the policies or actions of governments in every
place that we do business. Due to the long-term nature of our business and the
inevitability of political and social change, however, it is neither prudent
nor appropriate for Halliburton to establish its own country-by-country foreign
policy.
Because Halliburton already places a high priority on the treatment of all
persons with dignity and respect, the Board believes that the added reporting
will not create added value to the stockholders.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal. Proxies
solicited by the Board will be voted against the proposal unless instructed
otherwise.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON INDEXING EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS
(Item 4)
The Central Laborers' Pension Fund (the "Central Laborers' Fund"), with a
mailing address of P.O. Box 1267, Jacksonville, IL 62651, has notified
Halliburton that it wasintends to present the resolution set forth below to the
Annual Meeting for action by the stockholders. Central Laborers' Fund's
supporting statement for the
29
resolution, along with the Board of Directors' statement in the
best interestsopposition is set
forth below. As of Halliburton and the stockholders to authorize additionalNovember 22, 2000, Central Laborers' Fund beneficially owned
4,200 shares for issuance under the 1993 Plan so that an adequate number of shares
would be available for Plan purposes. Accordingly,Halliburton's common stock. Proxies solicited on February 20, 1997,behalf of the
Board of Directors adopted an amendment and restatement to the 1993 Plan, which
was approved by the stockholders on May 20, 1997. The amendment provided for an
increase in the total number of shares issuable under the Plan from 11,000,000
to 27,000,000 shares, of which no more than 4,000,000 (increased from
3,200,000) could be issued in the form of restricted stock awards.
Additionally, the amendment limited to 4,000,000 the number of shares that
could be issued pursuant to performance share awards and limited the terms of
stock options and stock appreciation rights to ten years.
Proposed Plan Amendment and Restatement
Broad-Based Awards. It is a stated objective of the Compensation Committee to
broaden the base of employee stock ownership throughout the company. In
furtherance of this objective, 628 stock option grants
29
totaling 1,987,365 shares were made in 1998, and 5,162 stock option grants
totaling 5,571,684 shares were made in 1999. As of March 20, 2000, only
6,520,857 shares were available for issuance under the 1993 Plan. It is the
Compensation Committee's intention to continue to drive stock options deeper
into the organization by making additional grants in the future. In order to
accomplish this goal, authorization of additional shares for issuance under the
1993 Plan will be required.
In addition,voted AGAINST this proposal unless stockholders
specify a contrary choice in their proxies.
Proposal
RESOLVED, that the Compensation Committee recommended toshareholders of Halliburton Company (the "Company")
request that the Board of Directors adopt an executive compensation policy that
all future stock option grants to senior executives shall be performance-based.
For the purposes of this resolution, a stock-option is performance-based if its
exercise price is linked to an industry performance index associated with the
peer group companies used for stock price comparisons in the Company's proxy
statement.
Supporting Statement
As long-term shareholders of the Company, we support executive compensation
policies and practices that provide challenging performance objectives and
serve to motivate executives to achieve long-term corporate value maximization
goals. While salaries and bonuses compensate management for short-term results,
the grant of stock and stock options has become the primary vehicle for
focusing management on achieving long-term results. Unfortunately, these option
grants can and do often provide levels of compensation well beyond those
merited. It has become abundantly clear that stock option grants without
specific performance-based targets often reward executives for stock price
increases due solely to a general stock market rise, rather than improved or
superior company performance.
One type of indexed stock options is options whose exercise price moves with
an appropriate market index composed of a company's primary competitors. The
resolution requests that the eligibility provisionsCompany's Board ensure that future Company stock
option plans link the option exercise price to an industry performance index
associated with the peer group of companies used for stock price comparisons in
the Company's proxy statement.
Implementing an indexed stock option plan would mean that our Company's
participating executives would receive payouts only if the Company's stock
price performance was better than that of the 1993 Plan be expanded to permit awards
underpeer group average. By tying the
Planexercise price to a broader group of employees and to non-employee Directors.
Broadeningmarket index, indexed options reward participating
executives for outperforming the base of employees eligible to participatecompetition. Indexed options would have value
when our Company's stock price rises in the 1993 Plan is
consistent with the Compensation Committee's objective discussed above.
Further, allowing non-employee Directors to be granted awards under the 1993
Plan will enhance Halliburton's ability to attract and retain highly qualified
Directors. Halliburton is currently in the minorityexcess of its peer companies in
not awardinggroup average or
declines less than its peer group average stock options to its Directors.
Section 162(m) Compliance. As discussed in the Report on Executive
Compensation on page 18, the 1993 Plan was amended by stockholders in 1996 to
qualify stock options and stock appreciation rights as performance-based
compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. This was done
by establishing a limit of 500,000 on the total number of shares that could be
awarded under stock options and SARs to an individual during a calendar year.
The proposed amendment would expand the award limitation to apply to
performance share awards, as well as to stock option and SAR grants, made to an
individual under the Plan in any one year. The maximum limit of 500,000 shares
is unchanged. In addition, the 1993 Plan amendment contains performance
criteria for future performance share awards to qualify those awards made to
executives subject to Section 162(m) as performance-based compensation. Those
criteria are set forth in the Performance Share Award section of the 1993 Plan
summary on page 33 of this proxy statement.
Repricing Prohibited. Even though the current provisions of the 1993 Plan do
not explicitly prohibit repricing, the Compensation Committee has never
adjusted or amendedprice decline. By downwardly
adjusting the exercise price of the option during a downturn in the industry,
indexed options remove pressure to reprice stock options or SARs.options. In short, superior
performance would be rewarded.
At present, the Company's stock option plan is not indexed to peer group
performance standards. Our Company's stock performance over the past five year
period has lagged the Standard & Poor 500 Index and modestly outperformed its
peer group industry average, according to the Company's most recent proxy
statement.
As long-term owners, we feel strongly that our Company would benefit from the
implementation of a stock option program that rewarded superior long-term
corporate performance. In response to strong negative public and shareholder
reactions to the excessive financial rewards provided executives by non-
performance based option plans, a growing number of shareholder organizations,
executive compensation experts, and companies are supporting the implementation
of indexed stock option plans. We urge your support for this important
governance reform.
The Compensation CommitteeBoard of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal for the
following reasons:
. The Board believes that the 1993 Plan should contain an express
provision prohibiting the repricing or the cancellation and reissuanceprovides appropriate incentives to
Halliburton's executives that are competitive with those of our comparator
group.
30
Because stock options and SARs. Accordingly,only have value if the proposed amendment and restatement includes
a repricing prohibition.
Plan Amendments Requiring Stockholder Approval. Finally,stock price appreciates
following the date of grant, executives' interests are linked directly to those
of stockholders. In addition, in determining the number of options granted to
an executive, the Compensation Committee recommendedconsiders competitive market data on
long-term incentive compensation for comparable positions within a comparator
group. This comparator group is composed of companies which reflect the markets
in which Halliburton competes for business and people.
The Board has implemented various measures to make sure that option grants
provide executives with the Board that the 1993 Plan be amended to require
stockholder approval of any Plan amendments that would:
. increase the total number of shares which may be issued;
. change the class of eligible participants;
. change the maximum individual award limits under the Plan;
. change the minimum exercise price or maximum award term;
. permit the repricing or the cancellation and reissuance of options; or
. extend the duration of the Plan.
Summary of Plan Amendments. Accordingly, on February 17,appropriate incentive, while protecting
stockholders. In 2000, the Board of
Directors adoptedstockholders approved an amendment and restatement to the 1993 Plan
subject to
stockholder approval. The amendment would:
. provide for an increase of 22,000,000 in the total number of shares that
may be issued under the Plan to 49,000,000 shares;
. combine the limit on the number of shares that may be issued in the form
of restricted stock or pursuant to performance share awards (currently,
there are separate limits for restricted stock and for performance share
awards of 4,000,000 each) and increase the combined limit from 8,000,000
to 16,000,000 shares;
. modify the eligibility provisions to permit a broader group of
Halliburton employees and the non-employee Directors to be eligible to
participate;
30
. expand the 500,000 share annual limit on awards to a participant to
include awards of performance shares, in addition to stock option and
SAR grants;
. specify performance criteria for performance share awards;
. prohibit repricing of stock options. This amendment was implemented even
though Halliburton has never repriced stock options. Additionally, option
grants are limited to a term of 10 years and vest over a three-year period.
The Board believes that indexing options as proposed would place Halliburton
at a competitive disadvantage in recruiting and SARs; andretaining executives.
. require stockholder approvalImplementation of the Plan amendments listed above.
The full textproposal would disqualify Halliburton's stock options
as performance-based compensation under Internal Revenue Code regulations,
thereby limiting the deductibility of compensation attributable to options
to the ultimate disadvantage of the 1993 Plan, as proposedstockholders.
Internal Revenue Code (S)162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation
expense over $1 million paid to be amended and restated,specified executives. Specific performance-
based compensation meeting IRS criteria is attached as Appendix Bexcluded from the calculation to
this proxy statement. The summary ofdetermine whether the proposed
amendment and restatement of the 1993 Plan is set forth below. The summary is
qualified by reference to the full text of the Plan. None of the additional
shares that, upon stockholder approval, will be subject$1 million cap has been exceeded. Amendments to the 1993
Plan has
previously been granted pursuantwere adopted in 1996 and 2000 to anyqualify stock award or subjected to any option.
THE 1993 PLAN
Types of Awards
The 1993 Plan provides for the grant of any or all of the following types of
awards:
. stock options, including Incentive Stock Options and non-qualified stock
options;
. stock appreciation
rights in tandem with stock options or freestanding;
. restricted stock;
. performance share awards; and
. stock value equivalent awards.
Any stock option granted in the form of an Incentive Stock Option must
satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. Awards
may be made to the same person on more than one occasion and may be granted
singly, in combination, or in tandem as determined by the Committee. To date
only awards of non-qualified stock options and restricted stock have been made
under the Plan.
Term
The 1993 Plan became effective as of February 18, 1993 and will terminate on
February 18, 2003, unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors.
Termination of the 1993 Plan will not affect awards made prior to termination,
but awards will not be made after termination.
Administration
The Board of Directors has appointed the Compensation Committee of Directors
to administer the 1993 Plan. The Compensation Committee is appointed by, and
serves at the pleasure of, the Board of Directors of Halliburton. Only those
Directors who are both "non-employee directors" for purposes of Rule 16b-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and "outside directors"
for purposes of the regulations promulgated under Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code, will act as Compensation Committee members. Subject to
the terms of the 1993 Plan, and to any approvals and other authority as the
Board of Directors may reserve to itself from time to time, the Compensation
Committee, consistent with the terms of the 1993 Plan, will have authority to:
. select the individuals to receive awards;
. determine the timing, form, amount or value and term of grants and
awards, and the conditions and restrictions, if any, subject to which
grants and awards will be made and become payable under the 1993 Plan;
. construe the 1993 Plan and to prescribe rules and regulations for the
administration of the 1993 Plan; and
. make any other determinations authorized under the 1993 Plan as the
Compensation Committee deems necessary or appropriate.
31
Eligibility
If the amendment is approved by the stockholders, a broader group of
employees of Halliburton and its affiliates will be eligible to participate in
the Plan. The selection of participants from eligible employees is within the
discretion of the Compensation Committee. In addition, if approved by
stockholders, non-employee Directors will be eligible to participate in the
Plan. Currently there are approximately 4,400 active participants in the 1993
Plan.
Shares Subject to the Plan
If the proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, an additional
22,000,000 shares of Common Stock will be reserved for issuance under the 1993
Plan. The 1993 Plan, as proposed to be amended, also provides that, of the
total number of shares issuable thereunder (49,000,000), no more than
16,000,000 shares may be issued in the form of restricted stock or pursuant to
performance share awards. To date, 2,804,772 shares have been issued in the
form of restricted stock and no shares have been issued pursuant to performance
share awards. This leaves a total of 13,195,228 shares available for issuance
for future restricted stock and performance share awards. In addition, if
approved byawards as performance-based compensation under IRS
rules. To the stockholders,extent that the 500,000 share limit on the total number of
shares which may be awarded to a participant in any calendar year will be
expanded to include performance share awards, in addition to stock options and
SARs. The Plan amendment would also prohibit the repricing or the cancellation
and reissuance of stock options or SARs.
Stock Options
Under the 1993 Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant awards in the form
of stock options to purchase shares of Common Stock. The Compensation Committee
will determine the number of shares subject to the option, the manner and time
of the option's exercise, and the exercise price per share of stock subject to
the option. The term of an option may not exceed ten years. No consideration is
received by Halliburton for granting stock options. The exercise price of a stock option will not beis less than the
fair market value of the Common Stockstock on the date of grant of the stock option,
is granted.compensation arising from the exercise would not qualify as performance-based
compensation and, thus, would be includable as compensation subject to the
limits on deductibility. Implementation of the proposal could result in denial
of tax deductibility of compensation expense arising from stock option
exercises by senior executives.
. Indexing the exercise price of options would have serious accounting
consequences on Halliburton's financial reporting.
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44
provide the accounting and financial reporting guidance relative to stock
options. The Compensation Committee will designate each
option as a non-qualified or an Incentive Stock Option. Information aboutmeasurement date for determining compensation costs for stock
options grantedis the first date on which are known both (1) the number of shares that
an individual employee is entitled to receive and (2) the stock option price.
If executives' stock options were indexed in 1999 may be found on page 21.
The option exercise price may,accordance with the proposal,
Halliburton would have to re-measure the compensation cost related to these
stock options at each quarterly financial reporting period and recognize that
expense over the discretion ofperiod the Compensation
Committee, be paid by a participant in cash, shares of Common Stock or a
combination of cash and Common Stock. Except as set forth below with regard to
specific corporate changes, no option will be exercisable within six months ofemployee performs the date of grant.
The effect of an optionee's death, disability, retirement or other
termination of service will be specified inrelated services. To the
option agreementextent that evidences
each option grant.
Stock Appreciation Rights
The 1993 Plan also authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant stock
appreciation rights either independent of, or in connection with, a stock
option. The exercise price of a SAR will not bestock option is less than the fair market
value of the Common Stock on the date the SAR is granted. If granted with a stock option exercise of SARs will result in the surrender of the right to purchase
the shares under the option as to which the SARs were exercised. Upon
exercising a SAR, the holder receives for each share for which the SAR is
exercised, an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price and the
fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise. Paymentgrant of that
amount may be made in shares of Common Stock, cash, or a combination of cash
and Common Stock, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The SARs willstock option,
compensation arising from the exercise would not be exercisable within six months ofbased on future performance
and the expense would have to be recognized on the date of grant. The term of a SAR
grant mayCurrent
financial reporting requirements for stock options do not exceed ten years. No consideration is received by Halliburton for
granting SARs.
Each grant of a SAR will be evidenced by an agreement that specifiesrequire the
terms and conditions of the award, including the effect of death, disability,
retirement or other termination of service on the exercisability of the SAR.
32
Restricted Stock
The 1993 Plan provides that shares of Common Stock subject to specific
restrictions may be awarded to eligible individuals as determined by the
Compensation Committee. These awards are subject to the 16,000,000 share limit
on the total number of shares that may be issued in the form of restricted
stock or pursuant to performance share awards. The Compensation Committee will
determine the nature and extent of the restrictions on the shares, the duration
of the restrictions, and any circumstance under which restricted shares will be
forfeited. With a limited exception, the restriction period may not be less
than three years from the date of grant. During the period of restriction,
recipients will have the right to receive dividends and the right to vote the
shares. The Compensation Committee will determine the effect of a restricted
stock recipient's death, disability, retirement or other termination of service
prior to the lapse of any applicable restrictions.
Performance Share Awards
The 1993 Plan permits the Compensation Committee to grant performance share
awards to eligible individuals. Performance share awards are awards that are
contingent on the achievement of one or more performance measures. These awards
are subject to the 16,000,000 share limit on the total number of shares that
may be issued in the form of restricted stock or pursuant to performance share
awards.
The performance criteria that may be used by the Compensation Committee in
granting performance share awards consist of objective tests based on the
following:
.earnings .cash value added performance
.cash flow .shareholder return and/or value
.customer satisfaction .operating profits (including EBITDA)
.revenues .net profits
.financial return ratios .earnings per share
.profit return and margins .stock price
.market share .cost reduction goals
.working capital .debt to capital ratio
The Compensation Committee may select one criterion or multiple criteria for
measuring performance. The measurement may be based on corporate, subsidiary or
business unit performance, or based on comparative performance with other
companies or other external measure of selected performance criteria. The
Compensation Committee will also determine the length of time over which
performance will be measured and the effect of an awardee's death, disability,
retirement or other termination of service during the performance period.
Stock Value Equivalent Awards
The 1993 Plan permits the Compensation Committee to grant stock value
equivalent awards to eligible individuals. Stock value equivalent awards are
rights to receive the fair market value of a specified number of shares of
Common Stock, or the appreciation in the fair market value of the shares, over
a specified period of time, pursuant to a vesting schedule, all as determined
by the Compensation Committee. Payment of the vested portion of a stock value
equivalent award shall be made in cash, based on the fair market value of the
Common Stock on the payment date. The Compensation Committee will also
determine the effect of an awardee's death, disability, retirement or other
termination of service during the applicable period.
Amendment
The 1993 Plan, as proposedassociated compensation expense to be amended, provides thatincluded in net earnings if the Board of
Directors may at any time terminateexercise
price equals or amendexceeds the Plan. However, the Board may
not, without approval of the stockholders, amend the 1993 Plan to:
. increase the total number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued
(except for adjustments in the number of shares permitted for stock
splits, stock dividends, mergers, reorganizations or recapitalizations);
33
. change the class of eligible participants;
. change the maximum annual individual award limits under the Plan;
. change the minimum option price or the maximum term of an award;
. permit the repricing or the cancellation and reissuance of options and
SARs; or
. extend the duration of the Plan beyond February 18, 2003.
No amendment or termination of the 1993 Plan shall, without the consent of the
optionee or participant, alter or impair rights under any options or other
awards previously granted.
Change-in-Control
In order to maintain all of the participants' rights in the event of a
change-in-control as defined in the 1993 Plan, the Compensation Committee
shall, acting in its sole discretion, take one or more of the following actions
regarding outstanding stock options or SARs:
. provide for acceleration of any time periods relating to exercise;
. require the surrender and cancellation of the award in exchange for a
cash payment equal to the amount which could have been attained had the
award currently been exercisable or payable;
. make an adjustment to any outstanding award as the Compensation
Committee deems appropriate to reflect the change-in-control; and
. in the case of stock options only, provide that an optionee shall be
entitled to purchase, in lieu of the number of shares of Common Stock
for which the option is then exercisable, the number and type of
securities or other property to which the optionee would have been
entitled pursuant to the change-in-control had the optionee immediately
prior to the change-in-control been the holder of the number of shares
of Common Stock covered by the option.
In the event of a change-in-control, the Compensation Committee may in its
discretion provide for full vesting and termination of restrictions on
restricted stock and for full vesting and payment of performance share awards
or stock value equivalent awards.
Federal Income Tax Treatment
The following summarizes the current U.S. federal income tax consequences
generally arising for awards under the 1993 Plan.
A participant who is granted an Incentive Stock Option does not realize any
taxable income at the time of the grant or at the time of exercise, but in some
circumstances may be subject to an alternative minimum tax as a result of the
exercise. Similarly, Halliburton is not entitled to any deduction at the time
of grant or at the time of exercise. If the participant makes no disposition of
the shares acquired pursuant to an Incentive Stock Option before the later of
two years from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise, any
gain or loss realized on a subsequent disposition of the shares will be treated
as a long-term capital gain or loss. Under these circumstances, Halliburton
will not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes. If the
participant fails to hold the shares for that period, the disposal is treated
as a disqualifying disposition. The gain on the disposition is ordinary income
to the participant to the extent of the difference between the option price and
theunderlying stock's fair market value on the exercise date. Any excessdate of
grant. If the proposal were adopted, additional compensation expense might have
to be recognized in the income statement arising from indexing stock options,
which would negatively impact Halliburton's reported financial performance as
compared to other companies.
In summary, the Board of Directors believes the right balance is being
achieved in the granting of stock options to executives. Implementation of the
proposal could have serious competitive, tax and financial consequences to
Halliburton.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal. Proxies
solicited by the Board will be voted against the proposal unless instructed
otherwise.
31
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION SYSTEM
(Item 5)
The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers' Pension Benefit Fund
(the "IBEW Fund"), located at 1125 Fifteenth St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005,
has notified Halliburton that it intends to present the resolution set forth
below to the Annual Meeting for action by the stockholders. IBEW Fund's
supporting statement for the resolution, along with the Board of Directors'
statement in opposition is set forth below. As of November 22, 2000, IBEW
Funds' Fund beneficially owned 55,288 shares of Halliburton's common stock.
Proxies solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors will be voted AGAINST
this proposal unless stockholders specify a contrary choice in their proxies.
Proposal
RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Halliburton Company ("Company") hereby
request that the Company's Board of Directors take the necessary steps to
establish a performance-based senior executive compensation system that focuses
the five most highly-paid members of management on advancing the long-term
or short-
term capital gain, dependingsuccess of the Company. To demonstrate that such steps have been taken, we
request that the Compensation Committee Report identify specific performance
criteria and explain why they have been selected; the specific target level
that must be achieved to satisfy that performance criteria; and rank each
performance factor in order of importance, as well as identify the weight
attached to each factor.
Supporting Statement
The long-term success of the Company depends on the holding period. Under these circumstances,
Halliburton will be entitledability of the board of
directors and senior management to establish and implement a tax deduction equalstrategic plan
that ensures the Company's long-term success. This strategic plan must meet the
needs of the Company's customers, recognize the important contributions of its
employees, accept the Company's responsibility to associate itself with
responsible vendors and suppliers, and satisfy all legal and ethical
responsibilities to the ordinary income
amountCompany's immediate and broader community.
Senior management must be keenly focused on fulfilling these strategic plans.
The best way to ensure proper focus is through a performance-based executive
compensation system that generously rewards superior performance. Specific
financial and non-financial performance criteria should be selected to focus
the participant recognizes infive most highly-paid members of management on advancing the long-term
success of the Company.
This system must be transparent, justifiable and challenging to focus senior
management and the rest of the Company. Accountability must be the cornerstone
of the system. Such a disqualifying disposition.
A participant whosystem would serve to motivate senior management and all
other employees throughout the ranks.
It is granted a non-qualifiedour opinion that too many companies, including our Company, reward
average or below average performance and do not motivate senior management to
excel. We believe that rather than challenging them to achieve superior
performance, enormous compensation packages, including massive stock option
doesgrants, effectuate significant and unjustifiable transfers of wealth from
shareholders to managers. We do not have
taxable incomebelieve such a system is in shareholders'
interest.
Consider the executive compensation system at the time of grant, but does have taxable income at the time
of exercise. The income equals the difference between the exercise price of the
shares and the market value of the shares on the date of exercise. Halliburton
is entitled to a corresponding tax deduction for the same amount.
34
The grant of a SAR will produce no U.S. federal tax consequences for the
participant or Halliburton. The exercise of an SAR results in taxable income to
the participant, equal to the difference between the exercise price of the
shares and the market price of the shares on the date of exercise, and a
corresponding tax deduction to Halliburton.
A participant who has been granted an award of restricted shares of Common
Stock will not realize taxable income at the time of the grant, and Halliburton
will not be entitled to a tax deduction at the time of the grant, unless the
participant makes an election to be taxed at the time of the award. When the
restrictions lapse, the participant will recognize taxable income in an amount
equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at that timeour Company. Our Company's
stock performance over the amount, if any, paid forpast five year period has lagged the shares. Halliburton will be entitled to a
corresponding tax deduction. Dividends paid to the participant during the
restriction period will also be compensation income to the participantStandard & Poor
500 Index and deductible as compensation expense by Halliburton. The holder of a restricted
stock award may elect to be taxed at the time of grant of the restricted stock
award on the market value of the shares, in which case:
. Halliburton will be entitled to a deduction atmodestly outperformed its peer group industry average. At the
same time, our Company's former Chairman and in the
same amount;
. dividends paid to the participant during the restriction period will be
taxable as dividends to himCEO Richard Cheney has received an
extremely generous compensation and not deductible by Halliburton;retirement package, including a base salary
of $1,283,000 and, . there will be no further federal income tax consequences when the
restrictions lapse.
A participant who has been granted a performance share award will not realize
taxable income at the time of the grant, and Halliburton will not be entitledaccording to a tax deduction atSeptember 2, 2000, Washington Post article a
"generous retirement package that time. A participant will realize ordinary income at
the time the awardincluded about $13.6 million in stock and
stock options."
32
Adoption of this proposal would advance a senior management compensation
system that promotes accountability, ensures management is paid equal to the amount of cash paid or the value of
shares delivered,rewarded for
excellent performance, not average results, and Halliburton will have a corresponding tax deduction.
The grant of a stock value equivalent award produces no U.S. federal income
tax consequences for the participant or Halliburton. The payment of a stock
value equivalent award results in taxable income to the participant equal to
the amount of the payment received, valued with reference to the fair market
value of the Common Stockfocuses management and all
employees on the payment date. Halliburton is entitled to a
corresponding tax deduction for the same amount.
Halliburton may deduct in connection with any award any taxes required by law
to be withheld. The Compensation Committee may permit the participant to
surrender, or authorize Halliburton to withhold, shares of Common Stock in
satisfaction of Halliburton's withholding obligations.
General/Vote Required
The closing price of Halliburton's Common Stock on March 20, 2000, as traded
on the New York Stock Exchange was $36.1875 per share.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Halliburton's Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitledachieving long-term success. We urge you to vote on the matter is needed to approve thefor this
proposal.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR"AGAINST the approvalproposal for the following
reasons:
The Board of Directors believes that the executive compensation program
currently in place at Halliburton is effective and properly motivates
executives to advance the long-term success of Halliburton. The Compensation
Committee is charged with the responsibility of designing and regularly
reviewing the total compensation program to ensure that it is effective in
attracting, retaining and motivating key employees and that it reinforces
business strategies which promote the Compensation Committee's primary
objective of enhancing shareholder value. In carrying out its responsibilities,
the Compensation Committee consults with outside compensation consultants and
considers competitive market data for a comparator group which reflects the
markets in which Halliburton competes for business and people.
As noted in the Compensation Committee's report beginning on page 10, the
principal long-term incentive for executives is the grant of stock options. The
exercise price of the proposed
amendmentstock options is equal to Halliburton's closing stock
price on the grant date. In addition, the Executive Performance Plan, which is
based on the achievement of given levels of CVA (cash value added) performance,
has elements of a long-term incentive plan because any incentive awards earned
are paid out in restricted stock vesting over a three-year period. The plan
design has the effect of reinforcing the relationship of incentive compensation
to shareholder value creation and restatementfocusing executives on a time frame longer
than one year.
The Board believes that the stock option program and the CVA-based incentive
plan already in place are responsive to the Proponent's request for an
executive compensation system that focuses executives on Halliburton's long-
term success. In addition, Halliburton is already complying with the
Proponent's request to identify the performance criteria and explain the
reasons for selection. As explained in the Compensation Committee's report, the
sole performance measure for the Executive Performance Plan is CVA; the reason
for its selection is to link incentive compensation to the enhancement of
shareholder value. In the case of stock options, the performance measure is
implicitly Halliburton's stock price. Stock options, which only have value if
the stock price rises, link the executives' interests with the stockholders and
encourage behavior that will have a positive impact on Halliburton's share
price. Stock options are the primary long-term incentives used by all the
companies in Halliburton's comparator group. In order to be competitive,
Halliburton must continue to grant options to its executives which are
comparable to those granted to executives of our peer companies.
Thus, while the Board is of the 1993 Stockopinion that Halliburton has met the first
two of the Proponent's requests, it is totally opposed to the proposal calling
for specification of performance targets. Disclosure of criteria that are
quantitative and Long-Term Incentive Plan.the weight associated with each quantitative factor would
place Halliburton at a serious competitive disadvantage. This would require
disclosure of financial and operational details that are more specific than
what is contained in the public disclosures of Halliburton and its competitors.
Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission's instructions relating to
the content of the Compensation Committee's report expressly provide that
disclosure of target levels of performance-related factors is not required if
the disclosure would have an adverse effect on the company.
As described in the Compensation Committee's report, during 2000, the
committee conducted a thorough analysis and study of its charter and executive
compensation philosophy, strategy, framework and processes. With the help of
the Compensation Committee's outside compensation consultant and management,
each component of Halliburton's executive compensation program was extensively
reviewed and adjustments were made where appropriate. The Board of Directors is
satisfied that the existing executive compensation components and the
incentives they create are in our stockholders' long-term interests.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST the proposal. Proxies
solicited by the Board will be voted against the proposal unless instructed
otherwise.
33
COST OF SOLICITATION
Officers and other employees of Halliburton may solicit proxies personally,
by telephone or other telecommunications from some stockholders if proxies are
not received promptly. Halliburton will reimburse banks, brokers or other
persons holding Halliburton Common Stock in their names or in the names of
their nominees for their charges and expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy
material to beneficial owners of 35
Halliburton's Common Stock. All expenses of
solicitation of proxies will be borne by Halliburton. In addition, Georgeson
Shareholder Communications Inc. has been retained to assist in the solicitation
of proxies for the 20002001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders at a fee of $11,000$12,500 plus
reasonable expenses.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 20012002 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholders are entitled to submit proposals on matters appropriate for
stockholder action consistent with regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Should a stockholder intend to present a proposal at the 20012002
Annual Meeting, it must be received by the Secretary of Halliburton (3600
Lincoln Plaza, 500 N. Akard Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-3391) not later than
November 23, 2000.22, 2001. The proposal must comply with all of the requirements of
Rule14a-8Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in order to
be included in Halliburton's proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that
meeting. The 20012002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held May 15, 2001.21, 2002.
34
OTHER BUSINESS
Halliburton's By-laws provide that in addition to any other applicable
requirements, for business to be properly brought before the Annual Meeting by
a stockholder, the stockholder must give timely notice in writing to the
Secretary. To be timely, a stockholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed
and received at the principal executive offices of Halliburton, not less than
ninety (90) days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding
stockholders meeting. A stockholder's notice to the Secretary shall set forth
as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring before the Annual Meeting:
. a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the
Annual Meeting and the reasons for conducting this business at the
Annual Meeting;
. the name and record address of the stockholder proposing the business;
. the class and number of shares of Halliburton which are beneficially
owned by the stockholder;
. a representation that the stockholder or a qualified representative of
the stockholder intends to appear in person to bring the proposed
business before the Annual Meeting; and
. any material interest of the stockholder in the business.
This requirement does not preclude discussion by any stockholder of any
business properly brought before the Annual Meeting in accordance with these
procedures.
The management of Halliburton is not aware of any business to come before the
meeting other than those matters described in this proxy statement. If any
other matters should properly come before the meeting, however, it is intended
that proxies in the accompanying form will be voted on those matters in
accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.
By Authority of the Board of
Directors,
/s/ SUSANSusan S. KEITHKeith
Susan S. Keith
Vice President and Secretary
March 23, 2000
3620, 2001
35
Appendix A
HALLIBURTON COMPANY AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
General
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Halliburton Company shall
consist of at least three independent directors. Members of the Committee shall
be considered independent if they have no relationship to the Company that
could interfere with the exercise of their independence from management and the
Company. As determined by the Board of Directors, the Members of the Committee
will be financially literate with at least one having accounting or related
financial management expertise. Company management, internal and independent
auditors and the Company's General Counsel may attend each meeting or portions
thereof as required by the Committee. The Committee will have four meetings
each year on a regular basis and will have special meetings if and when
required.
Responsibilities
The Audit Committee's role is one of oversight whereas the Company's
management is responsible for preparing the Company's financial statements and
the independent auditors are responsible for auditing those financial
statements. The Audit Committee is not providing any expert or special
assurance as to the Company's financial statements or any professional
certification as to the independent auditor's work. The following functions
shall be the key responsibilities of the Audit Committee in carrying out its
oversight function.
1. Provide an open avenue of communications between the internal and
independent auditors and the Board of Directors, including private
sessions with the internal and independent auditors, as the Committee may
deem appropriate.
2. Receive and review reports from Company management relating to the
Company's financial reporting process, published financial statements
and/or major disclosures and the adequacy of the company's system of
internal controls.
3. Receive and review reports from Company management and General Counsel
relating to legal and regulatory matters that may have a material impact
on the Company's financial statements and Company compliance policies.
4. Receive and review reports from internal auditors relating to major
findings and recommendations from internal audits conducted Company-wide.
Consult with and review reports from internal auditors relating to on-
going monitoring programs including the Company's Code of Business
Conduct and compliance with policies of the Company.
5. Inquire of company management and independent auditors regarding the
appropriateness of accounting principles followed by the Company, changes
in accounting principles and their impact on the financial statements.
6. Review the internal audit program in terms of scope of audits conducted
or scheduled to be conducted.
7. The Committee and Board shall be ultimately responsible for the
selection, evaluation, and replacement of the independent auditors. The
Committee will:
. recommend annually the appointment of the independent auditors to the
Board for its approval and subsequent submission to the stockholders
for ratification, based upon an annual performance evaluation and a
determination of the auditors' independence;
A-1
. determine the independence of the independent auditors by obtaining a
formal written statement delineating all relationships between the
independent auditors and the Company, including all non-audit services
and fees;
. discuss with the independent auditors if any disclosed relationship or
service could impact the auditors' objectivity and independence; and
A-1
. recommend that the Board take appropriate action in response to the
auditors' statement to ensure the independence of the independent
auditors.
8. Meet with independent auditors and review their report to the Committee
including comments relating to the system of internal controls, published
financial statements and related disclosures, the adequacy of the
financial reporting process and the scope of the independent audit. The
independent auditors are ultimately accountable to the Board and the
Committee on all such matters.
9. Receive and review reports from both the internal and independent
auditors relating to plans for the audit of the Company's information
technology procedures and controls.
10. Review with the internal and independent auditors the coordination of
their respective audit activities.
11. Prepare a Report, for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement,
disclosing that the Committee reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements with management and discussed certain other matters
with the independent auditors. Based upon these discussions, state in the
Report whether the Committee recommended to the Board that the audited
financial statements be included in the Annual Report.
12. Review and reassess the adequacy of the Audit Committee's charter
annually. If any revisions therein are deemed necessary or appropriate,
submit the same to the Board for its consideration and approval.
Quorum
For the transaction of business at any meeting of the Audit Committee, three
members shall constitute a quorum.
Approved as revised: Board of Directors of
Halliburton Company
February 17, 2000
Supercedes previous version dated:
September 11, 1997
A-2
Appendix B
HALLIBURTON COMPANY
1993 STOCK AND LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
As Amended and Restated February 17, 2000
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of the Halliburton Company 1993 Stock and Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the "Plan") is to provide a means whereby Halliburton Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and its Subsidiaries may attract, motivate and
retain highly competent employees and to provide a means whereby selected
employees can acquire and maintain stock ownership, thereby strengthening their
concern for the long-term welfare of the Company. The Plan is also intended to
provide employees with additional incentive and reward opportunities designed
to enhance the profitable growth of the Company over the long term. A further
purpose of the Plan is to allow awards under the Plan to Non-employee Directors
in order to enhance the Company's ability to attract and retain highly
qualified Directors. Accordingly, the Plan provides for granting Incentive
Stock Options, Options which do not constitute Incentive Stock Options, Stock
Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Performance Share Awards, Stock
Value Equivalent Awards, or any combination of the foregoing, as is best suited
to the circumstances of the particular employee or Non-employee Director as
provided herein.
II. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall be applicable throughout the Plan unless
specifically modified by any paragraph:
(a) "Award" means, individually or collectively, any Option, Stock
Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock Award, Performance Share Award or
Stock Value Equivalent Award.
(b) "Board" means the Board of Directors of Halliburton Company.
(c) "Change of Control Value" means, for the purposes of Clause (B) of
Paragraph (e) of Article XII and Clause (B) of Paragraph (f) of Article
XII, the amount determined in Clause (i), (ii) or (iii), whichever is
applicable, as follows: (i) the per share price offered to stockholders of
the Company in any merger, consolidation, sale of assets or dissolution
transaction, (ii) the per share price offered to stockholders of the
Company in any tender offer or exchange offer whereby a Corporate Change
takes place or (iii) if a Corporate Change occurs other than as described
in Clause (i) or Clause (ii), the fair market value per share determined by
the Committee as of the date determined by the Committee to be the date of
cancellation and surrender of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right. If the
consideration offered to stockholders of the Company in any transaction
described in this Paragraph or Paragraphs (e) and (f) of Article XII
consists of anything other than cash, the Committee shall determine the
fair cash equivalent of the portion of the consideration offered which is
other than cash.
(d) "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Reference in the Plan to any section of the Code shall be deemed to include
any amendments or successor provisions to such section and any regulations
under such section.
(e) "Committee" means the committee selected by the Board to
administer the Plan in accordance with Paragraph (a) of Article IV of the
Plan.
(f) "Common Stock" means the common stock par value $2.50 per share,
of Halliburton Company.
(g) "Company" means Halliburton Company.
B-1
(h) "Corporate Change" means one of the following events: (i) the
merger, consolidation or other reorganization of the Company in which the
outstanding Common Stock is converted into or exchanged for a different
class of securities of the Company, a class of securities of any other
issuer (except a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company), cash or other property; (ii) the sale, lease or exchange of all
or substantially all of the assets of the Company to any other corporation
or entity (except a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company); (iii) the adoption by the stockholders of the Company of a plan
of liquidation and dissolution; (iv) the acquisition (other than any
acquisition pursuant to any other clause of this definition) by any person
or entity, including without limitation a "group" as contemplated by
Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, of beneficial ownership, as
contemplated by such Section, of more than twenty percent (based on voting
power) of the Company's outstanding capital stock; or (v) as a result of or
in connection with a contested election of directors, the persons who were
directors of the Company before such election shall cease to constitute a
majority of the Board.
(i) "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
(j) "Fair Market Value" means, as of any specified date, the closing
price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (or, if the Common
Stock is not then listed on such exchange, such other national securities
exchange on which the Common Stock is then listed) on that date, or if no
prices are reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such
prices of the Common Stock are so reported. If the Common Stock is not then
listed on any national securities exchange but is traded over the counter
at the time a determination of its Fair Market Value is required to be made
hereunder, its Fair Market Value shall be deemed to be equal to the average
between the reported high and low sales prices of Common Stock on the most
recent date on which Common Stock was publicly traded. If the Common Stock
is not publicly traded at the time a determination of its value is required
to be made hereunder, the determination of its Fair Market Value shall be
made by the Committee in such manner as it deems appropriate.
(k) "Holder" means an employee or Non-employee Director of the Company
who has been granted an Award.
(l) "Immediate Family" means, with respect to a particular Holder, the
Holder's spouse, children and grandchildren (including adopted and step
children and grandchildren).
(m) "Incentive Stock Option" means an Option within the meaning of
section 422 of the Code.
(n) "Non-employee Director" means a member of the Board who is not an
employee or former employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries.
(o) "Option" means an Award granted under Article VII of the Plan and
includes both Incentive Stock Options to purchase Common Stock and Options
which do not constitute Incentive Stock Options to purchase Common Stock.
(p) "Option Agreement" means a written agreement between the Company
and a Holder with respect to an Option.
(q) "Optionee" means a Holder who has been granted an Option.
(r) "Parent Corporation" shall have the meaning set forth in section
424(e) of the Code.
(s) "Performance Share Award" means an Award granted under Article X
of the Plan.
(t) "Plan" means the Halliburton Company 1993 Stock and Long-Term
Incentive Plan.
(u) "Restricted Stock Award" means an Award granted under Article IX
of the Plan.
(v) "Rule 16b-3" means Rule 16b-3 of the general Rules and Regulation
of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act, as such
rule is currently in effect or as hereafter modified or amended.
B-2
(w) "Spread" means, in the case of a Stock Appreciation Right, an
amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of a share of
Common Stock on the date such right is exercised over the exercise price of
such Stock Appreciation Right.
(x) "Stock Appreciation Right" means an Award granted under Article
VIII of the Plan.
(y) "Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement" means a written agreement
between the Company and a Holder with respect to an Award of Stock
Appreciation Rights.
(z) "Stock Value Equivalent Award" means an Award granted under
Article XI of the Plan.
(aa) "Subsidiary" means a company (whether a corporation, partnership,
joint venture or other form of entity) in which the Company or a
corporation in which the Company owns a majority of the shares of capital
stock, directly or indirectly, owns a greater than twenty percent equity
interest, except that with respect to the issuance of Incentive Stock
Options the term "Subsidiary" shall have the same meaning as the term
"subsidiary corporation" as defined in section 424(f) of the Code.
III. EFFECTIVE DATE AND DURATION OF THE PLAN
The Plan shall be effective upon the date of its adoption by the Board,
provided the Plan is approved by the stockholders of the Company within twelve
months thereafter and on or prior to the date of the first annual meeting of
stockholders of the Company held subsequent to the acquisition of an equity
security by a Holder hereunder for which exemption is claimed under Rule 16b-
3. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or in any Option Agreement or
Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement, no Option or Stock Appreciation Right
shall be exercisable prior to such stockholder approval. No further Awards may
be granted under the Plan after ten years from the date the Plan is adopted by
the Board. Subject to the provisions of Article XIII, the Plan shall remain in
effect until all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan
have been exercised or expired by reason of lapse of time, all restrictions
imposed upon Restricted Stock Awards have lapsed and all Performance Share
Awards and Stock Value Equivalent Awards have been satisfied.
IV. ADMINISTRATION
(a) Composition of Committee. The Plan shall be administered by a committee
which shall be (i) appointed by the Board and (ii) constituted so as to permit
the Plan to comply with Rule 16b-3 and regulations promulgated under section
162(m) of the Code.
(b) Powers. The Committee shall have authority, in its discretion, to
determine which eligible individuals shall receive an Award, the time or times
when such Award shall be made, whether an Incentive Stock Option, nonqualified
Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be granted, the number of shares of
Common Stock which may be issued under each Option, Stock Appreciation Right
and Restricted Stock Award, and the value of each Performance Share Award and
Stock Value Equivalent Award. In making such determinations the Committee may
take into account the nature of the services rendered by the respective
individuals, their responsibility level, their present and potential
contribution to the Company's success and such other factors as the Committee
in its discretion shall deem relevant.
(c) Additional Powers. The Committee shall have such additional powers as
are delegated to it by the other provisions of the Plan. Subject to the
express provisions of the Plan, the Committee is authorized to construe the
Plan and the respective agreements executed thereunder, to prescribe such
rules and regulations relating to the Plan as it may deem advisable to carry
out the Plan, and to determine the terms, restrictions and provisions of each
Award, including such terms, restrictions and provisions as shall be requisite
in the judgment of the Committee to cause designated Options to qualify as
Incentive Stock Options, and to make all other determinations necessary or
advisable for administering the Plan. The Committee may correct any defect or
supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in any agreement relating
to an Award in the manner and to
B-3
the extent the Committee shall deem expedient to carry the Award into effect.
The determinations of the Committee on the matters referred to in this Article
IV shall be conclusive.
(d) Delegation of Authority. The Committee may delegate some or all of its
power to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company as the Committee deems
appropriate; provided, however, that (i) the Committee may not delegate its
power with regard to the grant of an Award to any person who is a "covered
employee" within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Code or who, in the
Committee's judgment, is likely to be a covered employee at any time during
the period an Award to such employee would be outstanding; and (ii) the
Committee may not delegate its power with regard to the selection for
participation in the Plan of an officer or other person subject to Section 16
of the Exchange Act or decisions concerning the timing, pricing or amount of
an Award to such an officer or other person.
V. GRANT OF OPTIONS, STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS, RESTRICTED STOCK
AWARDS, PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARDS AND STOCK VALUE EQUIVALENT
AWARDS; SHARES SUBJECT TO THE PLAN
(a) Award Limits. The Committee may from time to time grant Awards to one or
more individuals determined by it to be eligible for participation in the Plan
in accordance with the provisions of Article VI. The aggregate number of
shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed
49,000,000 shares, of which no more than 16,000,000 may be issued in the form
of Restricted Stock Awards or pursuant to Performance Share Awards.
Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the number of
Option shares or Stock Appreciation Rights, singly or in combination, together
with shares or share equivalents under Performance Share Awards granted to any
Holder in any one calendar year, shall not in the aggregate exceed 500,000.
Any of such shares which remain unissued and which are not subject to
outstanding Options or Awards at the termination of the Plan shall cease to be
subject to the Plan, but, until termination of the Plan, the Company shall at
all times reserve a sufficient number of shares to meet the requirements of
the Plan. Shares shall be deemed to have been issued under the Plan only to
the extent actually issued and delivered pursuant to an Award. To the extent
that an Award lapses or the rights of its Holder terminate or the Award is
paid in cash, any shares of Common Stock subject to such Award shall again be
available for the grant of an Award. The aggregate number of shares which may
be issued under the Plan shall be subject to adjustment in the same manner as
provided in Article XII with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to
Options then outstanding. Separate stock certificates shall be issued by the
Company for those shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive
Stock Option and for those shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of any
Option which does not constitute an Incentive Stock Option.
(b) Stock Offered. The stock to be offered pursuant to the grant of an Award
may be authorized but unissued Common Stock or Common Stock previously issued
and reacquired by the Company.
VI. ELIGIBILITY
Awards made pursuant to the Plan may be granted to individuals who, at the
time of grant, are employees of the Company or any Parent Corporation or
Subsidiary of the Company or are Non-employee Directors. An Award made
pursuant to the Plan may be granted on more than one occasion to the same
person, and such Award may include an Incentive Stock Option, an Option which
is not an Incentive Stock Option, an Award of Stock Appreciation Rights, a
Restricted Stock Award, a Performance Share Award, a Stock Value Equivalent
Award or any combination thereof. Each Award shall be evidenced by a written
instrument duly executed by or on behalf of the Company.
B-4
VII. STOCK OPTIONS
(a) Stock Option Agreement. Each Option shall be evidenced by an Option
Agreement between the Company and the Optionee which shall contain such terms
and conditions as may be approved by the Committee. The terms and conditions of
the respective Option Agreements need not be identical. Specifically, an Option
Agreement may provide for the payment of the option price, in whole or in part,
by the delivery of a number of shares of Common Stock (plus cash if necessary)
having a Fair Market Value equal to such option price. Each Option Agreement
shall provide that the Option may not be exercised earlier than six months from
the date of grant and shall specify the effect of termination of the Holder's
service on the exercisability of the Option.
(b) Option Period. The term of each Option shall be as specified by the
Committee at the date of grant; provided that, in no case, shall the term of an
Option exceed ten years.
(c) Limitations on Exercise of Option. An Option shall be exercisable in
whole or in such installments and at such times as determined by the Committee.
(d) Special Limitations on Incentive Stock Options. To the extent that the
aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time the respective Incentive
Stock Option is granted) of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock
Options are exercisable for the first time by an individual during any calendar
year under all incentive stock option plans of the Company and its Parent
Corporation and Subsidiaries exceeds $100,000, such excess Incentive Stock
Options shall be treated as Options which do not constitute Incentive Stock
Options. The Committee shall determine, in accordance with applicable
provisions of the Code, Treasury Regulations and other administrative
pronouncements, which of an Optionee's Incentive Stock Option will not
constitute Incentive Stock Options because of such limitation and shall notify
the Optionee of such determination as soon as practicable after such
determination. No Incentive Stock Option shall be granted to an individual if,
at the time the Option is granted, such individual owns stock possessing more
than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the
Company or of its Parent Corporation or a Subsidiary, within the meaning of
section 422(b)(6) of the Code, unless (i) at the time such Option is granted
the option price is at least 110% of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock
subject to the Option and (ii) such Option by its terms is not exercisable
after the expiration of five years from the date of grant.
(e) Option Price. The purchase price of Common Stock issued under each Option
shall be determined by the Committee, but such purchase price shall not be less
than the Fair Market Value of Common Stock subject to the Option on the date
the Option is granted.
(f) Options and Rights in Substitution for Stock Options Granted by Other
Corporations. Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted under the
Plan from time to time in substitution for stock options held by employees of
corporations who become, or who became prior to the effective date of the Plan,
employees of the Company or of any Subsidiary as a result of a merger or
consolidation of the employing corporation with the Company or such Subsidiary,
or the acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of all or a portion of the
assets of the employing corporation, or the acquisition by the Company or a
Subsidiary of stock of the employing corporation with the result that such
employing corporation becomes a Subsidiary.
(g) Repricing Prohibited. Except for adjustments pursuant to Article XII, the
purchase price of Common Stock for any outstanding Option granted under the
Plan may not be decreased after the date of grant nor may an outstanding Option
granted under the Plan be surrendered to the Company as consideration for the
grant of a new Option with a lower purchase price.
VIII. STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS
(a) Stock Appreciation Rights. A Stock Appreciation Right is the right to
receive an amount equal to the Spread with respect to a share of Common Stock
upon the exercise of such Stock Appreciation Right. Stock
B-5
Appreciation Rights may be granted in connection with the grant of an Option,
in which case the Option Agreement will provide that exercise of Stock
Appreciation Rights will result in the surrender of the right to purchase the
shares under the Option as to which the Stock Appreciation Rights were
exercised. Alternatively, Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted
independently of Options in which case each Award of Stock Appreciation Rights
shall be evidenced by a Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement between the Company
and the Holder which shall contain such terms and conditions as may be approved
by the Committee. The terms and conditions of the respective Stock Appreciation
Rights Agreements need not be identical. The Spread with respect to a Stock
Appreciation Right may be payable either in cash, shares of Common Stock with a
Fair Market Value equal to the Spread or in a combination of cash and shares of
Common Stock. With respect to stock Appreciation Rights that are subject to
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, however, the Committee shall, except as
provided in Paragraphs (e) and (f) of Article XII, retain sole discretion (i)
to determine the form in which payment of the Stock Appreciation Right will be
made (i.e., cash, securities or any combination thereof) or (ii) to approve an
election by a Holder to receive cash in full or partial settlement of Stock
Appreciation Rights. Upon the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Rights granted
hereunder, the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan shall be
reduced only to the extent that shares of Common Stock are actually issued in
connection with the exercise of such Right. Each Stock Appreciation Rights
Agreement shall provide that the Stock Appreciation Rights may not be exercised
earlier than six months from the date of grant and shall specify the effect of
a Holder's termination of service on the exercisability of the Stock
Appreciation Rights.
(b) Exercise Price. The exercise price of each Stock Appreciation Right shall
be determined by the Committee, but such exercise price shall not be less than
the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Stock
Appreciation Right is granted.
(c) Exercise Period. The term of each Stock Appreciation Right shall be as
specified by the Committee at the date of grant; provided that, in no case,
shall the term of a Stock Appreciation Right exceed ten years.
(d) Limitations on Exercise of Stock Appreciation Right. A Stock Appreciation
Right shall be exercisable in whole or in such installments and at such times
as determined by the Committee.
(e) Repricing Prohibited. Except for adjustments pursuant to Article XII, the
exercise price of a Stock Appreciation Right may not be decreased after the
date of grant nor may an outstanding Stock Appreciation Right granted under the
Plan be surrendered to the Company as consideration for the grant of a new
Stock Appreciation Right with a lower exercise price.
IX. RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
(a) Restricted Period To Be Established by the Committee. At the time a
Restricted Stock Award is made, the Committee shall establish a period of time
(the "Restriction Period") applicable to such Award; provided, however, that,
except as set forth below and as permitted by Paragraph (b) of this Article IX,
such Restriction Period shall not be less than three (3) years from the date of
grant (the "Minimum Criteria"). An award which provides for the lapse of
restrictions on shares applicable to such Award in equal annual installments
over a period of at least three (3) years from the date of grant shall be
deemed to meet the Minimum Criteria. The foregoing notwithstanding, with
respect to Restricted Stock Awards of up to an aggregate 550,000 shares
(subject to adjustment as set forth in Article XII), the Minimum Criteria shall
not apply and the Committee may establish such lesser Restriction Periods
applicable to such Awards as it shall determine in its discretion. Subject to
the foregoing, each Restricted Stock Award may have a different Restriction
Period, in the discretion of the Committee. The Restriction Period applicable
to a particular Restricted Stock Award shall not be changed except as permitted
by Paragraph (b) of this Article or by Article XII.
(b) Other Terms and Conditions. Common Stock awarded pursuant to a Restricted
Stock Award shall be represented by a stock certificate registered in the name
of the Holder of such Restricted Stock Award or, at the option of the Company,
in the name of a nominee of the Company. The Holder shall have the right to
receive
B-6
dividends during the Restriction Period, to vote the Common Stock subject
thereto and to enjoy all other stockholder rights, except that (i) the Holder
shall not be entitled to possession of the stock certificate until the
Restriction Period shall have expired, (ii) the Company shall retain custody of
the stock during the Restriction Period, (iii) the Holder may not sell,
transfer, pledge, exchange, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of the stock
during the Restriction Period and (iv) a breach of the terms and conditions
established by the Committee pursuant to the Restricted Stock Award shall cause
a forfeiture of the Restricted Stock Award. At the time of such Award, the
Committee may, in its sole discretion, prescribe additional terms, conditions
or restrictions relating to Restricted Stock Awards, including, but not limited
to, rules pertaining to the termination of a Holder's service (by retirement,
disability, death or otherwise) prior to expiration of the Restriction Period.
(c) Payment for Restricted Stock. A Holder shall not be required to make any
payment for Common Stock received pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award, except
to the extent otherwise required by law and except that the Committee may, in
its discretion, charge the Holder an amount in cash not in excess of the par
value of the shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan to the Holder.
(d) Miscellaneous. Nothing in this Article shall prohibit the exchange of
shares issued under the Plan (whether or not then subject to a Restricted Stock
Award) pursuant to a plan of reorganization for stock or securities in the
Company or another corporation a party to the reorganization, but the stock or
securities so received for shares then subject to the restrictions of a
Restricted Stock Award shall become subject to the restrictions of such
Restricted Stock Award. Any shares of stock received as a result of a stock
split or stock dividend with respect to shares then subject to a Restricted
Stock Award shall also become subject to the restrictions of the Restricted
Stock Award.
X. PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARDS
(a) Performance Period. The Committee shall establish, with respect to and at
the time of each Performance Share Award, a performance period over which the
performance applicable to the Performance Share Award of the Holder shall be
measured.
(b) Performance Share Awards. Each Performance Share Award may have a maximum
value established by the Committee at the time of such Award.
(c) Performance Measures. A Performance Share Award may be awarded contingent
upon the achievement of one or more performance measures. The performance
criteria for Performance Share Awards shall consist of objective tests based on
the following: earnings, cash flow, cash value added performance, shareholder
return and/or value, revenues, operating profits (including EBITDA), net
profits, earnings per share, stock price, cost reduction goals, debt to capital
ratio, financial return ratios, profit return and margins, market share,
working capital and customer satisfaction. The Committee may select one
criterion or multiple criteria for measuring performance. Performance criteria
may be measured on corporate, subsidiary or business unit performance, or on a
combination thereof. Further, the performance criteria may be based on
comparative performance with other companies or other external measure of the
selected performance criteria.
(d) Payment. Following the end of the performance period, the Holder of a
Performance Share Award shall be entitled to receive payment of an amount, not
exceeding the maximum value of the Performance Share Award, if any, based on
the achievement of the performance measures for such performance period, as
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Payment of a Performance
Share Award (i) may be made in cash, Common Stock or a combination thereof, as
determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, (ii) shall be made in a
lump sum or in installments as prescribed by the Committee in its sole
discretion and (iii) to the extent applicable, shall be based on the Fair
Market Value of the Common Stock on the payment date. If a payment of cash or
issuance of Common Stock is to be made on a deferred basis, the Committee shall
establish whether interest or dividend equivalents shall be credited on the
deferred amounts and any other terms and conditions applicable thereto.
B-7
(e) Termination of Service. The Committee shall determine the effect of
termination of service during the performance period on a Holder's Performance
Share Award.
XI. STOCK VALUE EQUIVALENT AWARDS
(a) Stock Value Equivalent Awards. Stock Value Equivalent Awards are rights
to receive an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of shares of Common Stock
or rights to receive an amount equal to any appreciation or increase in the
Fair Market Value of Common Stock over a specified period of time, which vest
over a period of time as established by the Committee, without payment of any
amounts by the Holder thereof (except to the extent otherwise required by law)
or satisfaction of any performance criteria or objectives. Each Stock Value
Equivalent Award may have a maximum value established by the Committee at the
time of such Award.
(b) Award Period. The Committee shall establish, with respect to and at the
time of each Stock Value Equivalent Award, a period over which the Award shall
vest with respect to the Holder.
(c) Payment. Following the end of the determined period for a Stock Value
Equivalent Award, the Holder of a Stock Value Equivalent Award shall be
entitled to receive payment of an amount, not exceeding the maximum value of
the Stock Value Equivalent Award, if any, based on the then vested value of the
Award. Payment of a Stock Value Equivalent Award (i) shall be made in cash,
(ii) shall be made in a lump sum or in installments as prescribed by the
Committee in its sole discretion and (iii) shall be based on the Fair Market
Value of the Common Stock on the payment date. Cash dividend equivalents may be
paid during, or may be accumulated and paid at the end of, the determined
period with respect to a Stock Value Equivalent Award, as determined by the
Committee. If payment of cash is to be made on a deferred basis, the Committee
shall establish whether interest shall be credited, the rate thereof and any
other terms and conditions applicable thereto.
(d) Termination of Service. The Committee shall determine the effect of
termination of service during the applicable vesting period on a Holder's Stock
Value Equivalent Award.
XII. RECAPITALIZATION OR REORGANIZATION
(a) Except as hereinafter otherwise provided, in the event of any
recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, combination, exchange,
stock dividend, stock split, extraordinary dividend or divestiture (including a
spin-off) or any other change in the corporate structure or shares of Common
Stock occurring after the date of the grant of an Award, the Committee may, in
its discretion, make such adjustment as to the number and price of shares of
Common Stock or other consideration subject to such Awards as the Committee
shall deem appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of rights of
the Holders.
(b) The existence of the Plan and the Awards granted hereunder shall not
affect in any way the right or power of the Board or the stockholders of the
Company to make or authorize any adjustment, recapitalization, reorganization
or other change in the Company's capital structure or its business, any merger
or consolidation of the Company, any issue of debt or equity securities having
any priority or preference with respect to or affecting Common Stock or the
rights thereof, the dissolution or liquidation of the Company or any sale,
lease, exchange or other disposition of all or any part of its assets or
business or any other corporate act or proceeding.
(c) The shares with respect to which Options may be granted are shares of
Common Stock as presently constituted, but if, and whenever, prior to the
expiration of an Option theretofore granted, the Company shall effect a
subdivision or consolidation of shares of Common Stock or the payment of a
stock dividend on Common Stock without receipt of consideration by the Company,
the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which such Option may
thereafter be exercised (i) in the event of an increase in the number of
outstanding shares shall be proportionately increased, and the purchase price
per share shall be proportionately reduced, and (ii) in the event of a
reduction in the number of outstanding shares shall be proportionately reduced,
and the purchase price per share shall be proportionately increased.
B-8
(d) If the Company recapitalizes or otherwise changes its capital structure,
thereafter upon any exercise of an Option theretofore granted the Optionee
shall be entitled to purchase under such Option, in lieu of the number of
shares of Common Stock as to which such Option shall then be exercisable, the
number and class of shares of stock and securities and the cash and other
property to which the Optionee would have been entitled pursuant to the terms
of the recapitalization if, immediately prior to such recapitalization, the
Optionee had been the holder of record of the number of shares of Common Stock
then covered by such Option.
(e) In the event of a Corporate Change, then no later than (i) two business
days prior to any Corporate Change referenced in Clause (i), (ii), (iii) or (v)
of the definition thereof or (ii) ten business days after any Corporate Change
referenced in Clause (iv) of the definition thereof, the Committee, acting in
its sole discretion without the consent or approval of any Optionee, shall act
to effect one or more of the following alternatives with respect to outstanding
Options which acts may vary among individual Optionees, may vary among Options
held by individual Optionees and, with respect to acts taken pursuant to Clause
(i) above, may be contingent upon effectuation of the Corporate Change: (A)
accelerate the time at which Options then outstanding may be exercised so that
such Options may be exercised in full for a limited period of time on or before
a specified date (before or after such Corporate Change) fixed by the
Committee, after which specified date all unexercised Options and all rights of
Optionees thereunder shall terminate, (B) require the mandatory surrender to
the Company by selected Optionees of some or all of the outstanding Options
held by such Optionees (irrespective of whether such Options are then
exercisable under the provisions of the Plan) as of a date (before or after
such Corporate Change) specified by the Committee, in which event the Committee
shall thereupon cancel such Options and pay to each Optionee an amount of cash
per share equal to the excess, if any, of the Change of Control Value of the
shares subject to such Option over the exercise price(s) under such Options for
such shares, (C) make such adjustments to Options then outstanding as the
Committee deems appropriate to reflect such Corporate Change (provided,
however, that the Committee may determine in its sole discretion that no
adjustment is necessary to Options then outstanding) or (D) provide that
thereafter upon any exercise of an Option theretofore granted the Optionee
shall be entitled to purchase under such Option, in lieu of the number of
shares of Common Stock as to which such Option shall then be exercisable, the
number and class of shares of stock or other securities or property (including,
without limitation, cash) to which the Optionee would have been entitled
pursuant to the terms of the agreement of merger, consolidation or sale of
assets or plan of liquidation and dissolution if, immediately prior to such
merger, consolidation or sale of assets or any distribution in liquidation and
dissolution of the Company, the Optionee had been the holder of record of the
number of shares of Common Stock then covered by such Option.
(f) In the event of a Corporate Change, then no later than (i) two business
days prior to any Corporate Change referenced in Clause (i), (ii), (iii) or (v)
of the definition thereof or (ii) ten business days after any Corporate Change
referenced in Clause (iv) of the definition thereof, the Committee, acting in
its sole discretion without the consent or approval of any Holder of a Stock
Appreciation Right, shall act to effect one or more of the following
alternatives with respect to outstanding Stock Appreciation Rights which acts
may vary among individual Holders, may vary among Stock Appreciation Rights
held by individual Holders and, with respect to acts taken pursuant to Clause
(ii) above, may be contingent upon effectuation of the Corporate Change (A)
accelerate the time at which Stock Appreciation Rights then outstanding may be
exercised so that such Stock Appreciation Rights may be exercised in full for a
limited period of time on or before a specified date (before or after such
Corporate Change) fixed by the Committee, after which specified date all
unexercised Stock Appreciation Rights and all rights of Holders thereunder
shall terminate, (B) require the mandatory surrender to the Company by selected
Holders of Stock Appreciation Rights of some or all of the outstanding Stock
Appreciation Rights held by such Holders (irrespective of whether such Stock
Appreciation Rights are then exercisable under the provisions of the Plan) as
of a date (before or after such Corporate Change) specified by the Committee,
in which event the Committee shall thereupon cancel such Stock Appreciation
Rights and pay to each Holder an amount of cash equal to the Spread with
respect to such Stock Appreciation Rights with the Fair Market Value of the
Common Stock at such time to be deemed to be the Change of Control Value or (C)
make such adjustments to Stock Appreciation Rights then outstanding as the
Committee deems appropriate to reflect
B-9
such Corporate Change (provided, however, that the Committee may determine in
its sole discretion that no adjustment is necessary to Stock Appreciation
Rights then outstanding).
(g) Except as hereinbefore expressly provided, the issuance by the Company of
shares of stock of any class or securities convertible into shares of stock of
any class, for cash, property, labor or services, upon direct sale, upon the
exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe therefor, or upon conversion of
shares or obligations of the Company convertible into such shares or other
securities, and in any case whether or not for fair value, shall not affect,
and no adjustment by reason thereof shall be made with respect to, the number
of shares of Common Stock subject to Options or Stock Appreciation Rights
theretofore granted, the purchase price per share of Common Stock subject to
Options or the calculation of the Spread with respect to Stock Appreciation
Rights.
(h) The provisions of the Plan or the Award agreements to the contrary
notwithstanding, with respect to any Restricted Stock Awards outstanding at the
time a Corporate Change occurs, the Committee may, in its discretion, provide
(i) for full vesting of all Common Stock awarded to the Holders pursuant to
such Restricted Stock Awards as of the date of such Corporate Change and (ii)
that all restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock Award shall terminate
as of such date.
(i) The provisions of the Plan or the Award agreements to the contrary
notwithstanding, with respect to any Performance Share Awards which have been
approved but which are unpaid at the time a Corporate Change occurs, the
Committee may, in its discretion, provide (i) for full vesting of such Awards
as of the date of such Corporate Change, (ii) for payment of the then value of
such Awards as soon as administratively feasible following the Corporate
Change, with the value of such Awards to be based, to the extent applicable, on
the Change of Control Value of the Common Stock, (iii) that any provisions in
Awards regarding forfeiture of unpaid Awards shall not be applicable from and
after a Corporate Change with respect to Awards made prior to such Corporate
Change and (iv) that all performance measures applicable to unpaid Awards at
the time of a Corporate Change shall be deemed to have been satisfied in full
during the performance period upon the occurrence of such Corporate Change.
(j) The provisions of the Plan or the Award agreements to the contrary
notwithstanding, with respect to any Stock Value Equivalent Awards which have
been approved but which are unpaid at the time a Corporate Change occurs, the
Committee may, in its discretion, provide (i) for full vesting of such Awards
as of the date of such Corporate Change and (ii) for payment of the then value
of such Awards as soon as administratively feasible following the Corporate
Change with the value of such Awards to be based on the Change of Control Value
of the Common Stock.
XIII. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
The Board in its discretion may terminate the Plan or alter or amend the Plan
or any part thereof from time to time; provided that no change in any Award
theretofore granted may be made which would impair the rights of the Holder
without the consent of the Holder, and provided, further, that the Board may
not, without approval of the stockholders, amend the Plan:
(a) to increase the aggregate number of shares which may be issued
pursuant to the provisions of the Plan, except as provided in Articles V
and XII;
(b) to change the class of persons eligible to receive Awards under
the Plan;
(c) to change the maximum individual award limits under the Plan;
(d) to change the minimum exercise price of an Option or Stock
Appreciation Right or the maximum Award term;
(e) to permit the repricing or cancellation and reissuance of Options
and Stock Appreciation Rights; or
(f) to extend the duration of the Plan beyond February 18, 2003.
B-10
XIV. OTHER
(a) No Right To An Award. Neither the adoption of the Plan nor any action of
the Board or of the Committee shall be deemed to give an employee or a non-
employee Director any right to be granted an Option, a Stock Appreciation
Right, a right to a Restricted Stock Award or a right to a Performance Share
Award or Stock Value Equivalent Award or any other rights hereunder except as
may be evidenced by an Award or by an Option or Stock Appreciation Agreement
duly executed on behalf of the Company, and then only to the extent of and on
the terms and conditions expressly set forth therein. The Plan shall be
unfunded. The Company shall not be required to establish any special or
separate fund or to make any other segregation of funds or assets to assure the
payment of any Award.
(b) No Employment Rights Conferred. Nothing contained in the Plan or in any
Award made hereunder shall (i) confer upon any employee any right to
continuation of employment with the Company or any Subsidiary or (ii) interfere
in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate his or
her employment at any time.
(c) No Rights to Serve as a Director Conferred. Nothing contained in the Plan
or in any Award made hereunder shall confer upon any Director any right to
continue their position as a Director of the Company.
(d) Other Laws; Withholding. The Company shall not be obligated to Issue any
Common Stock pursuant to any Award granted under the Plan at any time when the
offering of the shares covered by such Award has not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 and such other state and federal laws, rules or
regulations as the Company or the Committee deems applicable and, in the
opinion of legal counsel for the Company, there is no exemption from the
registration requirements of such laws, rules or regulations available for the
issuance and sale of such shares. No fractional shares of Common Stock shall be
delivered, nor shall any cash in lieu of fractional shares be paid. The Company
shall have the right to deduct in connection with all Awards any taxes required
by law to be withheld and to require any payments necessary to enable it to
satisfy its withholding obligations. The Committee may permit the Holder of an
Award to elect to surrender, or authorize the Company to withhold, shares of
Common Stock (valued at their Fair Market Value on the date of surrender or
withholding of such shares) in satisfaction of the Company's withholding
obligation, subject to such restrictions as the Committee deems necessary to
satisfy the requirements of Rule 16b-3.
(e) No Restriction on Corporate Action. Nothing contained in the Plan shall
be construed to prevent the Company or any Subsidiary from taking any corporate
action which is deemed by the Company or such Subsidiary to be appropriate or
in its best interest, whether or not such action would have an adverse effect
on the Plan or any Award made under the Plan. No Holder, beneficiary or other
person shall have any claim against the Company or any Subsidiary as a result
of any such action.
(f) Restrictions on Transfer. An Award shall not be transferable otherwise
than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a
"qualified domestic relations order" as defined by the Code or Title I of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and shall be
exercisable during the lifetime of the Holder only by such Holder, the Holder's
guardian or legal representative, a transferee under a qualified domestic
relations order or a transferee as described below; provided, however, that the
Committee shall have the authority, in its discretion, to grant (or to sanction
by way of amendment to an existing grant) Options (other than Incentive Stock
Options) which may be transferred by the Holder for no consideration to or for
the benefit of the Holder's Immediate Family, to a trust solely for the benefit
of the Holder and his Immediate Family, or to a partnership or limited
liability company whose only partners or shareholders are the Holder and
members of his Immediate Family, in which case the Option Agreement shall so
state. A transfer of an Option pursuant to this paragraph (f) shall be subject
to such rules and procedures as the Committee may establish. In the event an
Option is transferred as contemplated in this paragraph (f), (i) such Option
may not be subsequently transferred by the transferee except by will or the
laws of descent and distribution, and (ii) such Option shall continue to be
governed by and subject to the terms and limitations of the Plan and the
relevant Option
B-11
Agreement and the transferee shall be entitled to the same rights as the
Holder under Articles XII and XIII hereof as if no transfer had taken place.
The Option Agreement, Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement or other written
instrument evidencing an Award shall specify the effect of the death of the
Holder on the Award.
(g) Rule 16b-3. It is intended that the Plan and any grant of an Award made
to a person subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act meet all of the
requirements of Rule 16b-3. If any provision of the Plan or any such Award
would disqualify the Plan or such Award under, or would otherwise not comply
with, Rule 16b-3, such provision or Award shall be construed or deemed amended
to conform to Rule 16b-3.
(h) Governing Law. This Plan shall be construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Texas, except to the extent that it implicates matters which
are the subject of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware which
matters shall be governed by the latter law.
(i) Foreign Awardees. Without amending the Plan, the Committee may grant
Awards to eligible persons who are foreign nationals on such terms and
conditions different from those specified in the Plan as may, in the judgment
of the Committee, be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement
of the purposes of the Plan and, in furtherance of such purposes, the
Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures, subplans and
the like as may be necessary or advisable to comply with the provisions of
laws and regulations in other countries or jurisdictions in which the Company
or its Subsidiaries operate.
B-12
PROXY
HALLIBURTON COMPANY
Proxy for 20002001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned hereby appoints R.B. Cheney, D.J. Lesar, L.L. Coleman and S.S. Keith,
and any of them, proxies or proxy with full power of substitution and revocation
as to each of them, to represent the undersigned and to act and vote, with all
powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of Halliburton Company to be held in the Parisian Room
of the Fairmont Hotel, 1717 North Akard Street, Dallas, Texas, on Tuesday, May
16, 2000,15, 2001, on the following matters and in their discretion on any other matters
which may come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof. Receipt of
Notice-Proxy Statement dated March 23, 2000,20, 2001, is acknowledged.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by
the undersigned.
In the absence of such direction the proxy will be voted FOR the nominees listed
in Item 1, FOR the Proposal set forth in Item 2 and AGAINST the Proposals set
forth in Items 3, 4 and 5.
(Continued and to be signed on reverse side)
[ FOLD AND DETACH HERE ]
To vote in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations just sign below; Please mark
below;
no boxes need to be checked. The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR your votes as [X][ X ]
Items 1 and 2 and 3.AGAINST Items 3, 4 and 5. indicated in
this example
Item 1 - Election1-Election of Directors (Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for an individual
nominee write that nominee's name on the space provided
FOR all nominees WITHHOLD space provided below)
listed to the right AUTHORITY
(except as marked to the to vote for all nominees Nominees: 01 R.B. Cheney, 02 Lord Clitheroe, 0302 R.L. Crandall, 04 C.J.03 K.T. Derr,
contrary) listed to the right 04 C.J. DiBona, 05 L.S. Eagleburger, 06 W.R. Howell, 07 R.L. Hunt,
08 D.J. Lesar, 09 A.B. Lewis, 10 J.L. Martin, 11 J.A. Precourt,
[ ] [ ] Martin, 09 J.A. Precourt and 1012 D.L. Reed, 13 C.J. Silas.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------_________________________________________________________________
Item 2 - Proposal2-Proposal for ratification of selection of Item 3-Shareholder proposal on Myanmar (Burma).
independent public accountants for the Company for 2000.2001
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Item 3 - Proposal to amend and restate the 1993 Stock and
Long-Term Incentive Plan4-Shareholder proposal on indexing stock options. Item 5-Shareholder proposal on executive compensation system.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Yes
Item 4 - In6-In their discretion, upon such other business I plan to attend the meeting [ ]
as may properly come before the meeting.
This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned.
In the absence of such direction the proxy will be voted FOR the nominees listed in Item 1 and FOR
the Proposals set forth in Items 2 and 3.
I PLANIN THE FUTURE, WOULD YOU CONSENT TO ATTEND THEYes
ACCESSING YOUR ANNUAL REPORT AND PROXY [ ]
MEETING
Signature Signature Date
------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ----------------------STATEMENT ELECTRONICALLY VIA THE INTERNET?
Signature____________________________________________ Signature____________________________________________ Date___________________
NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee
or guardian, please give full title as such.
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
VOTE BY TELEPHONE
QUICK *** EASY *** IMMEDIATE
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! - YOU CAN VOTE IN ONE OF TWO WAYS:
1. TO VOTE BY PHONE: Call toll-freeVote by Internet or Telephone or Mail
24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
+--------------------------------+ +-----------------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
| Internet | | Telephone | | Mail |
| http://www.proxyvoting.com/hal | | 1-800-840-1208 on a touch tone| | |
| | | | | |
| Use the Internet to vote your | | Use any touch-tone telephone 24 hours a day - 7 days a week
There is NO CHARGE to you for this call. -| | Mark, sign and date |
| proxy. Have your proxy card in hand.| | vote your proxy. Have your proxy | | your proxy card |
| hand when you access the web | OR | card in hand when you call. You | OR | and |
| site. You will be askedprompted to | | will be prompted to enter a Control Number, which isyour | | return it in the |
| enter your control number, | | control number, located in the | | enclosed postage-paid |
| located in the box inbelow, to | | box below, and then follow the lower right hand corner of this form
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPTION 1: To vote as the Board of Directors recommends on ALL proposals, press 1.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When asked, please confirm by Pressing 1.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPTION 2: If you choose to vote on each Proposal separately, press 0. You will hear these instructions:
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal 1 - To vote FOR ALL nominees, press 1: to WITHHOLD FOR ALL nominees, press 9.
To WITHHOLD FOR AN INDIVIDUAL nominee, Press 0| | envelope. |
| create and listen to the instructions.
Proposal 2 - To vote FOR, press 1; AGAINST, press 9; ABSTAIN, press 0.
Proposal 3 - To vote FOR, press 1; AGAINST, press 9; ABSTAIN, press 0.
When asked, please confirm by Pressing 1.
or
--
2. TO VOTE BY PROXY: Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return promptly in the enclosed envelope.
NOTE:submit an | | directions given. | | |
| electronic ballot. | | | | |
+--------------------------------+ +-----------------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone,
THERE IS NO NEED TO MAIL BACKyou do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card.
THANK YOU FOR VOTING.proxy card.